
Pages
-
Page 1
LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION 2005 Annual Report
-
Page 2
2005 Financial Highlights1 (In millions, except per share data and ratios) 2005 2004 2003 Net sales $37,213 $35,526 $31,824 Operating profit from business segments 3,432 2,976 2,468 Consolidated operating profit 2,986 2,089 2,019 Net earnings 1,825 1,266 1,053 Earnings per diluted share 4.10 2.83 2.34 Average diluted common shares outstanding 445.7 447.1 450.0 Net cash provided by operating activities $ 3,194 $ 2,924 $ 1,809 Cash dividends per common share 1.05 0.91 0.58 Cash, cash equivalents and short-term investments 2,673 1,456 1,250 Total assets 27,744 25,554 26,175 Total debt 4,986 5,119 6,208 Stockholders’ equity $ 7,867 $ 7,021 $ 6,756 Common shares outstanding at year-end 432 438 446 Debt-to-total-capital ratio 39% 42% 48% Return on invested capital2 14.5% 10.8% 9.6% NOTES: 1 For a discussion of matters affecting the comparability of the information presented above, refer to Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations on pages 17 through 40 of this Annual Report. 2 For additional information concerning return on invested capital, including its definition, use and revised method of calculation, see Note (f) to the Consolidated Financial Data—Five Year Summary on page 74 of this Annual Report. On the Cover: Lockheed Martin’s Center for Innovation: Defining the Networked World, Delivering the Future
-
Page 3
We Never Forget Who We’re Working For Lockheed Martin’s capabilities are aligned with the highest priorities of our customers in defense, homeland security and civil government agencies. As one company and one team, the 135,000 men and women of Lockheed Martin take pride in delivering the advanced technologies that protect liberty and promote progress for people worldwide. PAGE 1
-
Page 4
PAGE 2
-
Page 5
Dear Fellow Stockholders, The solid execution of our business strategy in 2005 has yielded the strong financial results our stockholders expect from Lockheed Martin. We have in place a comprehensive strategy of disciplined growth as well as a culture of operational excellence, the ability to flex with dynamic market conditions and a leadership team that is focused squarely on making Lockheed Martin the preeminent global security enterprise. In 2005, we achieved sales of $37.2 billion, a five per- of the opportunities in the marketplace today, customer cent increase over the previous year. Significantly, we commitments must be a priority, and that means focus- can report earnings per share (EPS) of $4.10. In fact, ing on execution across the portfolio. our EPS has grown at a double-digit rate over the past Our Systems and Information Technology (IT) four years. We also generated $3.2 billion in operating businesses demonstrated particular momentum this cash in 2005, providing this company with financial year. With 50 percent of total sales coming from our flexibility. Rounding out the picture, our balance sheet Systems and IT group, we are pleased to report that we is healthy, demonstrated by a 39 percent debt-to-total- have achieved an impressive record. Lockheed Martin capital ratio. is the number one provider of Systems and IT to both Our revised calculation of Return on Invested defense and civil government agencies, and that lead- Capital (ROIC), an important barometer of our finan- ership was strengthened last year as the National cial performance and a key metric for evaluating execu- Archives and Records Administration selected tive incentive compensation, showed a 34 percent Lockheed Martin to preserve and manage all its elec- increase over 2004 to 14.5 percent in 2005. tronic records. We continue to execute a balanced cash deploy- In the defense arena, Lockheed Martin continues ment strategy by which a majority of our free cash flow to lead the way in building net-centric battlespace oper- will be returned to stockholders in the form of share ations by delivering the tools that process and share repurchases and dividends. In 2005, we repurchased information. The defense side of our business is also 19.7 million shares of our common stock, bringing the distinguished by the production of the world’s only 5th total stock repurchase to 46.1 million shares since Generation aircraft, as well as advanced space and mis- 2002. We also increased the dividend by 20 percent, sile systems that help our forces and allies maintain a reflecting our commitment to pay an attractive, com- military advantage on the front lines. We also provide a petitive dividend. wide range of technologies and systems that extend As we enter 2006, this management team is keenly beyond combat power—missions that include peace- aware that the world around us is changing at a rapid keeping and humanitarian relief. pace. Sitting still is never an option in our business, so It is increasingly important to envision applica- we are solidifying our leadership position in tradi- tions of these game-changing technologies for critical tional markets as well as gaining ground in new homeland security and civil government IT require- higher-growth areas. We know that to take advantage ments. In one example of this forward thinking, we Facing Page: Robert J. Stevens, Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer PAGE 3
-
Page 6
successfully leveraged the Systems and it expertise helicopter program. our team also laid the keel for the resident across the enterprise to offer the new York U.S. navy’s first advanced Littoral Combat Ship in Metropolitan transit Authority the best design for a 2005, although we are not a shipbuilder. these accom- critical infrastructure protection system. this project plishments are indicative of our people—their brain- will integrate command, control and communications power and unyielding passion to invent, perfect, perform capabilities throughout the entire new York City and and team with partners to create best value solutions. suburban transit system. Significant milestones in 2005 also included: Winning and delivering on this vital domestic secu- rity contract, as well as other complex systems efforts, • We are on track for the first flight of the F-35 Joint requires that we adhere to our strategy of horizontal Strike Fighter later this year, as the majority of this integration, in which we align ourselves internally and aircraft’s structural assembly was completed in 2005. apply our resources to provide the best solutions for our • the F-22 Raptor reached initial operational customers’ challenges. horizontal integration also Capability in 2005. together, the F-22 and the F-35 means teaming effectively across the global supply will ensure air dominance for the U.S. military and chain—to remain the industry partner of choice in the joint forces against threats for the next 40 years. United States and more than 50 other countries. • the Federal Aviation Administration began use of organizing the right teams and resources was the our Advanced technologies and oceanic procedures rationale behind establishing our Maritime Surveillance (Atop) system, which will increase the capacity enterprise in 2005. this corporate-wide effort to sup- and efficiency of international air travel. Sixty per- port the navy’s maritime patrol and reconnaissance mis- cent of the world’s air traffic is controlled by our sion mobilizes the expertise we need to perform at our air traffic management systems. peak on existing programs and to capture new business. • We received the first international orders for the As we continue to transform Lockheed Martin combat-proven patriot Advanced Capability-3 into a fully networked global security enterprise, we (pAC-3) missile from the netherlands and Japan. can point with great pride to the opening of our Center for innovation in April 2005. • Lockheed Martin was selected to process informa- Located in Suffolk, Virginia, the Center for tion gathered for the Year 2010 U.S. Census, build- innovation is an advanced laboratory dedicated to ing on our success on the Year 2000 U.S. Census experimentation, simulation and analysis. the Center and the 2001 U.k. Census. for innovation is backed by a nationwide network of • the venerable titan iV celebrated 50 years of suc- our best labs and brightest minds, burnishing Lockheed cess with its historic final launch on october 19. Martin’s credentials as a technology and business inno- We also celebrated 50 years of unmatched perfor- vator; it is a position that we must not cede to any of our mance of the U-2 which continues to provide high- competitors. in the long run, we believe the Center for altitude reconnaissance for our national security. innovation will support our goal to add new business • the C-130J transport aircraft, being deployed in orders and grow our backlog. southwest Asia, achieved a major performance in a time of vigorous competition, the advantage milestone by completing operational testing. it is a goes to the company with foresight and creative think- significant step to finalizing the U.S. Air Force’s ing. Although we are not a helicopter manufacturer, we operational test & evaluation. were selected in 2005 to lead the Vh-71 presidential PAGE 4
-
Page 7
In 2005, we also announced a joint venture with Anticipating future opportunities demands leaders who The Boeing Company to combine our respective pro- drive operational excellence. These are men and women duction and launch operations associated with U.S. gov- who set the course, energize their teams and lead them ernment launches. Structured as a 50-50 joint venture, toward their goal. the United Launch Alliance will provide our national Full spectrum leaders operate as one team, and security and NASA launch customers with assured they take the high road distinguished by a dedication to access to space at a lower cost to the taxpayers. Recog- ethics, superlative corporate governance, integrity and nizing budgetary pressures and the need for greater accountability. We conduct consistent ethics training for efficiencies, the United Launch Alliance will eliminate every Lockheed Martin employee, embedding these rig- duplicate infrastructure and enhance reliability. As of orous standards deep into the fabric of the Corporation. this writing, we are awaiting government approval of We are an enterprise that embraces the diversity of the joint venture. its workforce and a commitment to hiring the best tal- Portfolio shaping in 2005 included selective acqui- ent. As the employer of choice, Lockheed Martin is a sitions designed to bolster our presence in the impor- company of more than 65,000 scientists and engineers. tant arena of net-centric and IT technologies, both for I was particularly gratified to witness the generos- defense and civil government applications. ity and compassion of the men and women of Lockheed We acquired The SYTEX Group, Inc. which pro- Martin as they responded to the tragic events of the vides information technology and technical support past year. Lockheed Martin and its employees contrib- services to the Department of Defense and other fed- uted well over $5 million for relief to victims of the eral agencies. SYTEX, which specializes in informa- tsunami, earthquake in Pakistan and in the aftermath tion warfare, network security solutions and integrated of hurricanes Katrina and Rita. Lockheed Martin peo- logistics, offers access to new customers and should pro- ple also lent their support to our troops overseas through vide appropriate financial returns to the shareholders. our partnership with Operation USO Care Package. We acquired two companies in the United In closing, we at Lockheed Martin are confident Kingdom, expanding Lockheed Martin’s commitment that we can continue to build on the progress we have to a critical ally and the world’s second largest defense made in the interest of our customers, partners, employ- market. STASYS Ltd. specializes in network commu- ees, stockholders and our country. Tremendous possi- nications, defense interoperability, simulation and air bilities lie ahead for all of us and we will work tirelessly traffic management consulting. INSYS Group Ltd. is a to bring them to fruition. diversified supplier of military communications sys- tems, weapons systems and advanced analysis services. March 1, 2006 In addition, we acquired Coherent Technologies Inc., a Colorado-based developer of high-performance laser-based remote sensing systems, and announced our intention to acquire Aspen Systems Corp., an informa- tion management company with experience in deliver- ing IT products to the federal government. The financial and operational muscularity of this Corporation is a testament to the full-spectrum leader- Robert J. Stevens ship that our 135,000 employees bring to the table. Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer PAGE 5
-
Page 8
» » F-35 Simulator: Partners in Joint Force Protection: The Virtual Battlespace. Homeland Security. Achieving Information Superiority. PAGE 6
-
Page 9
Powered by Innovation » » » The men and women of Lockheed Martin are driven by a passion for invention in both technology and business. In April 2005, we opened the Center for Innovation, an advanced laboratory dedicated to experimentation, information integration and analysis. At the Center for Innovation, we are collaborating with our customers in testing potential solutions in a fully net-centric environment in order to address today’s critical defense and homeland security challenges. Backed by a nationwide network of our best labs and brightest minds, the Center for Innovation is a beacon for inventive thinking and cutting-edge technology. PAGE 7
-
Page 10
» » Clear Skies: The FAA’s Automated Digital Speed: IT Services for Preserving Our Heritage: National Archives Flight Services Station. the Social Security Administration. and Records Administration. Forward Thinking With extensive Systems & Information Technology capabilities, Lockheed Martin has earned a reputation as the number one provider of IT solutions to the Federal Government. At Lockheed Martin, we apply this expertise to the pressing demands of our customers in defense, homeland security and civil government. As a result, we require people committed to forward thinking who can mobilize resources and talent resident throughout the Corporation. In a significant domestic security initiative, the New York Metropolitan Transit Authority selected Lockheed Martin to design and build its infrastructure protection system. PAGE 8
-
Page 11
PAGE 9
-
Page 12
» » The High Ground: London Police: Sniper XR: Providing pilots with the most The Mobile User Objective System (MUOS) Utilizing networks to protect the public. capable and maintainable targeting system satellite will transmit vital data to in the world. mobile forces worldwide. PAGE 10
-
Page 13
Global Security » » » The new and emerging threats to the security of the United States and our allies require a global security enterprise that understands how to respond and operate in a net-centric battlespace. As a dynamic systems integrator, Lockheed Martin delivers networked systems that link assets on land, at sea, in the air and in space. In an uncertain world, our goal is to provide the capabilities that can deter conflict or prevail in victory when called upon. Mission Success: Patriot Advanced Capability-3 (PAC-3) missile defense test at White Sands Missile Range. PAGE 11
-
Page 14
» » VH-71 Helicopter: Redefining customer service for F-22 Support Center: Building a net-centric Lockheed Martin leads the team to build the U.K. Royal Mail. platform for air dominance in the 21st century. and integrate the new fleet of Marine One helicopters for the President of the United States. Horizontal Integration » » » As a company that takes Horizontal Integration seriously, we combine talented people across the breadth of Lockheed Martin to invent, perfect and perform. In addition to promoting internal collaboration, Horizontal Integration means organizing across the industrial base, to remain the industry partner of choice in the United States and in more than 50 countries. Whatever the challenge, our approach is straightforward: One Company, One Team. The F-35 is a truly transformational aircraft with variants that will satisfy future requirements of the U.S. Air Force, Navy and Marine Corps as well as the U.K. Royal Air Force and Royal Navy. Aside from the United Kingdom, international participants on this combat aircraft program include Italy, The Netherlands, Turkey, Canada, Australia, Denmark and Norway. Here lasers are used in F-35 advanced manufacturing. PAGE 12
-
Page 15
-
Page 16
» » In partnership with the USO, We bring our skills back to the communities in which we live and work through mentoring and other Lockheed Martin employees prepare educational initiatives. We support local math, science, engineering and computer sciences programs much appreciated care packages for from elementary education through the university level with grants. our troops overseas. PAGE 14
-
Page 17
Guided by Integrity » » » At Lockheed Martin we are motivated by a commitment to ethical business conduct and superlative corporate governance at every level of the organization. There also is a steadfast belief at Lockheed Martin that we are a company of 135,000 individuals working to build a better world through support for education, our communities, and our military men and women. Whether partnering with the USO or assisting those in need after natural disasters, Lockheed Martin people respond with generosity and compassion. Lockheed Martin employees pitched in with their time and their money to help those communities affected by the tsunami as well as hurricanes Katrina and Rita. These employee volunteers made a difference in the aftermath of hurricane Katrina. PAGE 15
-
Page 18
Financial Section Lockheed Martin Corporation, 2005 Annual Report 2005 Financial Highlights Inside Front Cover Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations 17 Management’s Report on the Financial Statements and Internal Control Over Financial Reporting 41 Report of Ernst & Young LLP, Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm, Regarding Internal Control Over Financial Reporting 42 Report of Ernst & Young LLP, Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm, on the Audited Consolidated Financial Statements 43 Audited Consolidated Financial Statements: Consolidated Statement of Earnings 44 Consolidated Balance Sheet 45 Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows 46 Consolidated Statement of Stockholders’ Equity 47 Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements 48 Consolidated Financial Data—Five Year Summary 73 Corporate Directory 75 General Information 77 Forward-Looking Statements—Safe Harbor Provisions 78 PAGE 16
-
Page 19
LockheedMartinCorporation MANAGEMENT’SDISCUSSIONANDANALYSISOF FINANCIALCONDITIONANDRESULTSOFOPERATIONS December31,2005 FINANCIALSECTIONROADMAP Reports related to the financial statements and internal ThefinancialsectionofourAnnualReportincludesmanage- control over financial reporting (pages 41 through 43) — ment’sdiscussionandanalysis,ourconsolidatedfinancialstate- includethefollowing: ments, notes to those financial statements and a five-year • Areportfrommanagement,indicatingourresponsibilityfor summary of financial information. We have prepared the fol- financialreporting,thefinancialstatements,andthesystem lowingsummary,or“roadmap,”toassistinyourreviewofthe of internal control over financial reporting and an assess- financialsection.Itisdesignedtogiveyouanoverviewofour mentoftheeffectivenessofthosecontrols; companyandfocusyourreviewbydirectingyoutosomeofthe • A report from Ernst & Young LLP, an independent regis- moreimportantactivitiesandeventsthatoccurredthisyear. tered public accounting firm, including their opinions on management’sassessmentofinternalcontroloverfinancial LockheedMartin’sBusiness reporting and the effectiveness of internal control over LockheedMartinCorporationprincipallyresearches,designs, financialreporting;and develops, manufactures, integrates, operates and sustains • AreportfromErnst&YoungLLP,includingtheiropinion advanced technology systems, products and services. We onthefairpresentationofourfinancialstatementsbasedon mainlyservecustomersindomesticandinternationaldefense, theiraudits. civilagencies,andhomelandsecurity.Oursalestoagenciesof the U.S. Government represented 85% of our sales in 2005. Financial statements (pages 44 through 47) —include our Oftheremaining15%ofsales,approximately13%relatedto consolidatedstatementsofearnings,cashflowsandstockhold- sales to international customers, with the remainder attribut- ers’ equity for each of the last three years, and our balance able to commercial customers. In 2004 and 2003, sales to sheetasoftheendofthelasttwoyears.Ourfinancialstate- agenciesoftheU.S.Governmentrepresented80%and78%of mentsarepreparedinaccordancewithU.S.generallyaccepted our total sales, respectively. Our main areas of focus are in accountingprinciples(GAAP). defense, space, intelligence/homeland security, and govern- mentinformationtechnology. Notes to the financial statements (pages 48 through 72) — We operate in five principal business segments: provide insight into and are an integral part of our financial Aeronautics, Electronic Systems, Space Systems, Integrated statements. The notes contain explanations of our significant Systems&Solutions(IS&S),andInformation&Technology accounting policies, details about certain of the captions on Services (I&TS). As a lead systems integrator, our products the financial statements, information about significant events andservicesrangefromelectronicsandinformationsystems, ortransactionsthathaveoccurred,discussionsaboutlegalpro- includingintegratednet-centricsolutions,tomissiles,aircraft, ceedings,commitmentsandcontingencies,andselectedfinan- spacecraftandlaunchservices. cialinformationrelatingtoourbusinesssegments.Thenotes to the financial statements also are prepared in accordance FinancialSectionOverview withGAAP. Thefinancialsectionincludesthefollowing: Management’sdiscussionandanalysis,orMD&A(pages17 through 40) —provides management’s view about industry trends, risks and uncertainties relating to Lockheed Martin, accountingpoliciesthatweviewascriticalinlightofourbusi- ness,ourresultsofoperations,includingdiscussionsaboutthe keyperformancedriversofeachofourbusinesssegments,our financial position and cash flows, commitments and contin- gencies, important events or transactions that have occurred over the last three years, and forward-looking information, asappropriate. PAGE 17
-
Page 20
LockheedMartinCorporation MANAGEMENT’SDISCUSSIONANDANALYSISOF FINANCIALCONDITIONANDRESULTSOFOPERATIONS December31,2005 Highlights TheU.S.DepartmentofDefense(DoD)recentlycompleted The financial section of our Annual Report describes our the Congressionally mandated 2006 Quadrennial Defense ongoing operations, including discussions about particular Review(QDR).TheQDRcontinuesandacceleratestheDoD’s linesofbusinessorprograms,ourabilitytofinanceouroperat- priorcommitmenttoatransformationofthemilitarytofocus ingactivities,andtrendsanduncertaintiesinourindustryand moreontheneedsofitscombatantcommandersandtodevelop how they might affect our future operations. We also discuss portfolios of joint capabilities rather than stove-piped pro- those items affecting our results that were not considered in grams. This movement towards horizontally-integrated struc- seniormanagement’sassessmentoftheoperatingperformance tures is expected to become an organizing principle for the ofourbusinesssegments.Weseparatelydisclosetheseitemsto DoD in making investment decisions for future systems. We assistinyourevaluationofouroveralloperatingperformance formedtheIntegratedSystems&Solutionsbusinesssegment andfinancialconditionoftheconsolidatedcompany.Wewould in2003tohelpusbetterfocusourintegratedsolutionscapa- liketodrawyourattentiontothefollowingitemsdisclosedin bilities across the Corporation and enhance our ability to thisfinancialsectionandwhereyouwillfindthem: serveasaleadpartnerwiththeDoD.In2005,weopenedour Center for Innovation, a state-of-the-art facility for modeling Topic Location(s) andsimulatingournet-centricsolutionsforourcustomers. Criticalaccountingpolicies: ThePresident’sbudgetproposalforfiscalyear2007and Contractaccounting/ beyond presents a framework to reduce the federal budget revenuerecognition Page22andpage50 deficit while prosecuting the global war on terrorism. The Postretirementbenefitplans Page24andpage61 DoDbudgetisgrowing,butatlowerlevelsthaninthepastfew Environmentalmatters Page26,page50andpage68 years,inordertocontinuethemodernizationandrecapitaliza- Discussionofbusinesssegments Page28andpage69 tion that began earlier this decade. The budget for the Liquidityandcashflows Page34andpage46 DepartmentofHomelandSecurityisincreasing,whilespend- Capitalstructureandresources Page35,page45,page47and ingacrossothernon-defensefederalagenciesisanticipatedto page59 declinethrough2011.ThesechangesinthePresident’sbudget Legalproceedings,commitments plan reflect a commitment to a 50% reduction in the federal andcontingencies Page37andpage66 budget deficit by 2009, and the sentiment expressed by the Stock-basedcompensation Page38,page51andpage60 Federal Reserve that sustained federal deficits could hamper economicgrowth. INDUSTRYCONSIDERATIONS ThePresident’sbudgetproposalincludes$439billionfor DepartmentofDefenseBusiness theDoD,including$84billionforprocurementofsystemsand Customerrequirementsfordefenseandrelatedadvancedtech- $73 billion for research and development. Transformation of nology systems for 2006 and beyond will continue to be the DoD enterprise and accompanying budget pressures also affectedbytheglobalwaronterrorismthroughthecontinued maycreateadditionalopportunitiesforsupplychainlogistics, need for military missions and reconstruction efforts in Iraq businessprocessmanagementandoutsourcingofservicefunc- and Afghanistan and the related fiscal consequences of war. tionsbythemilitaryservices,expandingthescopeofprivate The war on terrorism has focused greater attention on the sectorcontractingopportunitiesattheDoD. security of our homeland and better communication and The Fiscal Year 2007-2011 Future Years Defense Plan interoperability between law enforcement, civil government (FYDP)projectssustainedgrowthintheDoD’stoplinebud- agencies, intelligence agencies and our military services. At get,risingfrom$439billionin2007to$502billionin2011. thesametime,ournation’soveralldefenseposturecontinues Theseestimatesdonotincludeanyallowancetofundongoing to move toward a more joint-capabilities-based structure, military operations in Iraq, Afghanistan and the global war which creates the ability for a more flexible response with on terrorism, which are expected to be addressed through greater force mobility, stronger space capabilities, enhanced annual supplemental appropriations as required. The DoD’s missiledefenseandimprovedinformationsystemscapabilities continued emphasis on systems modernization is reflected in andsecurity. theproposedgrowthintheFYDPforProcurement,whichis PAGE 18
-
Page 21
LockheedMartinCorporation estimatedtoincreasefrom$84billionin2007to$118billion We are also represented in almost every aspect of land, in 2011. Research, Development, Test and Engineering sea,airandspace-basedmissiledefense,includingtheAEGIS (RDT&E)spendingwillremainroughlythesameduringthis WeaponSystemprogram,theMediumExtendedAirDefense period, ranging from $73 billion in 2007 to $75 billion in System (MEADS), the Patriot Advanced Capability (PAC-3) 2009,decliningthento$71billionin2011. missile program, the Terminal High Altitude Area Defense Whilesubjecttochangeinfuturespecificbudgetsubmis- (THAAD)system,andtheMultipleKillVehicleprogram.Inthe sions and annual appropriation by Congress, these estimates areas of space intelligence and information superiority, we continuetheAdministration’slongstatedintenttomodernize have leadership positions on programs such as the TSAT theArmedForceswhileprosecutingthewaronterrorism.The Mission Operations System (TMOS), Mobile User Objective differing trends in Procurement and RDT&E budgets reflect System (MUOS), the Advanced Extremely High Frequency the maturation of programs emerging from RDT&E funding (AEHF) system, and the Space-Based Infrared System-High intoprocurement,suchastheF-35program. (SBIRS-H),andinclassifiedprogramsandbattlemanagement Inthepasttwoyears,Congressprovidedforsupplemental commandandcontrolcapabilities.Inairlift,wehavetheC-130J appropriationstodefraycostsforOperationIraqiFreedomand program and are under contract to upgrade the C-5 strategic Operation Enduring Freedom in Afghanistan. Approximately airliftaircraft.Manyoftheaforementionedprogramsrequire $50 billion has already been provided relative to 2006 and fundingoverseveralbudgetcycles.Thereisalwaysaninher- another $70 billion has been requested. These supplemental ent risk that these and other large, highly visible programs appropriations have enabled the DoD to proceed on critical which are subject to annual appropriation by Congress could modernizationandacquisitionprograms,versususingamounts become potential targets for future reductions or elimination availableforthoseprogramstopayfortheIraqandAfghanistan offundingtopayforotherprograms. missions. While there is no assurance that additional supple- Wecontinuallyexploreopportunitiestoexpandintoadja- mental appropriations will be approved by Congress, we do centproductlinesutilizingourexistingadvancedtechnology notbelievethatsustainedoperationsinIraqandAfghanistan products and services, and have been successful in doing so will materially impact the procurement and research and throughsuchprogramsastheLittoralCombatShipandMarine developmentbudgetinthenearterm. OneU.S.PresidentialHelicopterprograms.Wealsoarecon- Webelievethatourbroadmixofprogramsandcapabili- tinuingtopursueopportunitiestoexpandoursustainmentand ties positions us favorably to support the future needs of the logisticalsupportactivitiestoenhancethelongevityofthesys- variousagenciesoftheU.S.Governmentindefenseandinfor- temsprocuredbyourcustomers.Inaddition,wehavefocused mation technology. Our major programs and capabilities oureffortsonselectacquisitions,costsavingsandimproving include: missile defense; space intelligence; command, con- efficiency.Throughtheseactivities,wehavebeenabletopass trol, communications, computers, intelligence, surveillance alongsavingstoourcustomers,mainlytheU.S.Government. and reconnaissance (C4ISR); air mobility aircraft; and air- power projection/precision-strike capability. In terms of size Non-DepartmentofDefenseBusiness and long-term potential impact, two of our more significant Weprovideproductsandservicestoanumberofgovernment programsaretheF-22RaptorandtheF-35JointStrikeFighter. agencies other than the DoD, including the Departments of The Air Force approved the F-22 for full rate production, Homeland Security, Justice, Commerce, Health and Human declaredinitialoperationalcapabilityandratedtheF-22“mis- Services and Energy, the U.S. Postal Service, the Social sion capable” based on successful completion of operational SecurityAdministration,theFederalAviationAdministration, testing. The DoD plans to continue production of the F-22 the National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA), through2011tocoincidewiththeanticipatedproductionofthe the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and the Library F-35 to avoid a gap in 5TH Generation fighter stealth and of Congress. Although our lines of business addressing civil advancedavionicscapabilities.Whiletheultimatenumberof governmentneedsarenotdependentondefensebudgets,they F-35stobeproducedwillcontinuetobesubjecttodebate,the sharemanyofthesamerisksasourdefensebusinesses,aswell QDRandbudgetindicatesupportfortheprogram. asotherrisksuniquetotheparticularprograms. PAGE 19
-
Page 22
LockheedMartinCorporation MANAGEMENT’SDISCUSSIONANDANALYSISOF FINANCIALCONDITIONANDRESULTSOFOPERATIONS December31,2005 For example, although indemnification by the U.S. WeprovideproductsandservicestoNASA,includingthe Governmenttocoverpotentialclaimsorliabilitiesresultingfroma Space Shuttle program, mainly through our Space Systems failureoftechnologiesdevelopedanddeployedmaybeavailable and Information & Technology Services business segments. insomeinstancesforourdefensebusinesses,U.S.Government Wealsohavea50%equityinterestinUnitedSpaceAlliance, indemnification may not be available for homeland security LLCwhichprovidesgroundprocessingandotheroperational purposes. While we maintain insurance for some business servicestotheSpaceShuttleprogram.Weexpecttocompete risks,itisnotpossibletoobtaincoveragetoprotectagainstall for NASA programs related to the next generation manned operational risks and liabilities. We do plan to seek, and in spaceexplorationprogram. certaincaseshaveobtained,limitationofsuchpotentialliabil- Non-U.S. defense budgets have generally been flat or itiesrelatedtothesaleanduseofourhomelandsecurityprod- decliningoverthepastdecade.Asaresult,consolidationhas uctsandservicesthroughqualificationbytheDepartmentof beenoccurringintheEuropeanaerospaceindustry,resulting Homeland Security under the “SAFETY Act” provisions of infewerbutlargerandmorecapablecompetitors. theHomelandSecurityActof2002.Intheeventwewereto provide homeland security-related products and services to a SpaceBusiness customerwithoutsuchqualification,wewouldnotbeafforded Salesofcommerciallaunchvehiclesandsatellitescontinuesto thebenefitoftheSAFETYAct’scapontortliabilityorU.S. beverycompetitiveduemainlytolowdemandfornewsatel- Government indemnification. In addition, our information lites as a result of excess capacity in the telecommunications technologyproductsandservicesrelatedtoHomelandSecurity industry.Thereductionindemandhasresultedinpricingpres- may raise potential liabilities associated with privacy issues sures for both launch vehicles and satellites. Despite this forwhichneitherindemnificationnorSAFETYActcoverage environment,wedidreceivenewordersforcommercialsatel- isavailable.Otherrisksuniquetocivilgovernmentprograms litesandlaunchvehiclesinboth2004and2005.Foradiscus- may include development of competing products, technologi- sionoftheresultsofoperationsofourSpaceSystemssegment, calfeasibilityandproductobsolescence. seethe“DiscussionofBusinessSegments”section. We have continued to expand our capabilities in critical The above factors have impacted orders for the Evolved intelligence, knowledge management and E-Government ExpendableLaunchVehicle(EELVorAtlasV),ournextgen- solutions for our customers, including the Social Security eration launch vehicle program in which we have made sig- Administration and the EPA, as well for the DoD. We also nificant investments over the past few years. The Atlas V is provideprogrammanagement,businessstrategyandconsulting, availableforbothcommercialandU.S.Governmentuse.This complexsystemsdevelopmentandmaintenance,completelife- program has required investment of funds for research and cycle software support, information assurance and enterprise development,start-upandothernonrecurringcosts,andlaunch solutions.ConsistentwiththePresident’sagenda,theexpected facilities.Someoftheseexpenditureshavebeenfundedunder growthinbusinessprocessoutsourcinghasbeenenabledby anagreementwiththeU.S.Government. rulechangesforpublic/privatecompetitions.Suchacompeti- We have received a total of 19 launch assignments from tionledtotheselectionin2005ofLockheedMartintooperate theU.S.Government,nineofwhichareundercontractandin the Federal Aviation Administration’s Automated Flight backlog. The 19 launch assignments include seven that were ServicesStationNetwork.Inaddition,recenttrendscontinueto reassigned in 2003 from the original EELV competition indicateanincreaseindemandbyfederalandcivilgovernment (referredtoas“Buy1”)asaresultofourcompetitor’sviola- agenciesforupgradingandinvestinginnewinformationtech- tionoftheProcurementIntegrityAct.Twoofthesevenlaunch nologysystemsandsolutions.Asaresult,wecontinuetofocus reassignments were for West Coast launches and, since then, our resources in support of infrastructure modernization that the Air Force has assigned us four additional West Coast allowsforinteroperabilityandcommunicationacrossagencies. launches. To prepare for these, we upgraded our West Coast In addition, the increase in emphasis on homeland secu- launch facilities, which required further investment in the ritymayincreasedemandforourcapabilitiesinareassuchas EELV program (see Note 5 to the financial statements). We airtrafficmanagement,portsandwaterwayssecurity,biohaz- expect to recover the investment through the pricing of the ard detection systems for postal equipment, information sys- WestCoastlaunches. temssecurityandotherglobalsecuritysystemssolutions. PAGE 2 0
-
Page 23
LockheedMartinCorporation TheU.S.Governmenthasbeenawardinglaunchmissions either Boeing or Lockheed Martin may terminate the joint incrementallyasitcontinuestodevelopitsacquisitionstrategyfor ventureagreement. futurenationalmissions.TheU.S.Governmentplanstomaintain Lockheed-Khrunichev-EnergiaInternational,Inc.(LKEI), assuredaccesstospacetothemaximumextentpossibleandhas ajointventurewehavewithtwoRussiangovernment-owned recognized the need to fund additional EELV infrastructure space firms, has exclusive rights to market launches of com- costs created by the weaker-than-originally-anticipated com- mercial, non-Russian-origin space payloads on the Proton mercial demand for launch services. We had three Atlas familyofrocketsfromalaunchsiteinKazakhstan.Oneofthe launches in 2005, including our fifth Atlas V commercial joint venture partners, Khrunichev State Research and launch.Asofyearend2005,theAtlasfamilyoflaunchvehi- ProductionSpaceCenter(Khrunichev),isthemanufacturerof cles had a record of 77 consecutive successful launches. the Proton launch vehicle and provider of the related launch CommercialordersandpricesfortheAtlasVlaunchvehicle services in Russia. Commercial Atlas and Proton launch ser- todatehavebeenlowerthanweoriginallyexpectedduringthe vices are marketed around the world through International developmentphaseofthevehicle. Launch Services (ILS), a joint venture between Lockheed In 2005, we entered into an agreement with Boeing to MartinandLKEI.Weconsolidatetheresultsofoperationsof create a joint venture that would combine the production, LKEIandILSintoourfinancialstatementsbasedonourcon- engineering, test and launch operations associated with U.S. trolling financial interest. We received four new awards for GovernmentlaunchesofourAtlaslaunchvehiclesandBoeing’s launchesonProtonvehiclesin2005.Contractsforlaunchser- Deltalaunchvehicles.Thejointventure,namedUnitedLaunch vices usually require substantial advances from the customer Alliance, LLC (ULA), is structured as a 50-50 joint venture priortolaunch.Attheendof2005,$315millionofadvances andwouldbeaccountedforasanequityinvestment.Underthe received from customers for Proton launch services not yet termsofthejointventure,AtlasandDeltaexpendablelaunch provided was included as a liability in our balance sheet in vehicleswouldcontinuetobeavailableasalternativesonindi- customeradvancesandamountsinexcessofcostsincurred. vidual launch missions. The agreement also stipulates that, A sizeable percentage of the advances we receive from uponclosingofthetransaction,LockheedMartinandBoeing customersforProtonlaunchservicesaresenttoKhrunichev. willdismissallclaimsagainsteachotherinthependingcivil Ifacontractedlaunchserviceisnotprovided,asizeableper- litigationrelatedtoapreviouscompetitionforlaunchesunder centage of the related advance would have to be refunded to theAirForceEELVprogram(seeNote15foradiscussionof our customer. At year-end 2005, payments to Khrunichev thatlitigation). included in inventories for launches under contract totaled The closing of the ULA transaction is subject to condi- $190 million. Our ability to recover these advances may be tionstoclosing,includinggovernmentandregulatoryapprov- affected by Khrunichev’s ability to provide the launch ser- als and agreements in the United States and internationally. vices, as well as economic conditions and the political envi- On August 9, 2005, the European Commission determined ronmentinRussia.Throughtheendof2005,launchservices that ULA was compatible with European Union merger con- through LKEI and ILS have been provided according to trol regulation. On October 24, 2005, the Federal Trade contractterms. Commission (FTC) requested additional information from TheCorporationhasenteredintoanagreementwithRD Lockheed Martin and Boeing related to ULA in response AMROSS,ajointventureofthePratt&Whitneydivisionof to the pre-merger notice under the Hart-Scott-Rodino United Technologies Corporation and the Russian firm NPO AntitrustImprovementsActof1976(HSR)submittedbythe Energomash,forthepurchase,subjecttocertainconditions,of parties.TheFTC’s“secondrequest”extendstheperiodthat RD-180 booster engines for use in the Corporation’s Atlas theFTCispermittedtoreviewthetransactionundertheHSR launchvehicles.Termsoftheagreementcallforpaymentsto Act.WecurrentlyplantoclosetheULAtransactionassoon be made to RD AMROSS upon the achievement of certain as practicable following satisfaction of all the closing condi- milestones in the manufacturing process. Payments of $70 tions.Wedonotexpectthatitsformationwillhaveasignifi- millionmadeunderthisagreementforenginesnotyetdeliv- cantimpactonourresultsofoperationsorfinancialposition ered were included in the Corporation’s inventories at for2006.Iftheconditionstoclosingarenotsatisfiedandthe December31,2005. ULA transaction is not consummated by March 31, 2006, PAGE 21
-
Page 24
LockheedMartinCorporation MANAGEMENT’SDISCUSSIONANDANALYSISOF FINANCIALCONDITIONANDRESULTSOFOPERATIONS December31,2005 Asdiscussedabove,commercialsatellitesaleshavecon- The nature of our international business also makes us tinuedtoexperiencepricingpressuresduetoexcesscapacity. subjecttotheexportcontrolregulationsoftheU.S.Department However,inthepasttwoyears,wehavereceivedsixcommer- ofStateandtheDepartmentofCommerce.Iftheseregulations cialsatelliteordersandareinactivediscussionsforadditional areviolated,itcouldresultinmonetarypenaltiesanddenialof satellite orders. In addition to commercial activity, we also exportprivileges.Wearecurrentlyunawareofanyviolations received new orders for government satellites in 2004 and of export control regulations which are reasonably likely to 2005, including those under the MUOS program and certain haveamaterialadverseeffectonourbusinessorourresultsof classifiedactivities. operations,cashflowsorfinancialposition. OtherBusinessConsiderations CRITICALACCOUNTINGPOLICIES Asagovernmentcontractor,wearesubjecttoU.S.Government ContractAccounting/RevenueRecognition oversight.Thegovernmentmayaskaboutandinvestigateour A large part of our business is derived from long-term con- business practices and audit our compliance with applicable tractsfordesign,developmentandproductionactivitieswhich rulesandregulations.Dependingontheresultsofthoseaudits we account for consistent with the American Institute of andinvestigations,thegovernmentcouldmakeclaimsagainst Certified Public Accountants’ (AICPA) audit and accounting us.Undergovernmentprocurementregulationsandpractices, guide, Audits of Federal Government Contractors, and the anindictmentofagovernmentcontractorcouldresultinthat AICPA’s Statement of Position 81-1, Accounting for contractor being fined and suspended from being able to bid Performance of Construction-Type and Certain Production- on, or be awarded, new government contracts for a period of TypeContracts.Wealsoenterintocontractstoprovideother time. A conviction could result in debarment for a specific services that are not associated with design, development or period of time. Similar government oversight exists in most productionactivities.Weaccountforthosecontractsinaccor- othercountrieswhereweconductbusiness.Althoughwecannot dance with the Securities and Exchange Commission’s Staff predicttheoutcomeofthesetypesofinvestigationsandinqui- Accounting Bulletin (SAB) No. 104, Revenue Recognition, rieswithcertainty,basedoncurrentfacts,wedonotbelievethat and other relevant revenue recognition accounting literature. anyoftheclaims,auditsorinvestigationspendingagainstusare We consider the nature of these contracts and the types of likelytohaveamaterialadverseeffectonourbusinessorour productsandservicesprovidedwhenwedeterminetheproper resultsofoperations,cashflowsorfinancialposition. accountingmethodforaparticularcontract. WeareexposedtorisksassociatedwithU.S.Government contracting,includingtechnologicaluncertainties,dependence AccountingforDesign,Development onfewermanufacturingsuppliersandobsolescence,aswellas andProductionContracts Congressionalappropriationandallotmentoffundseachyear. Generally, we record long-term, fixed-price design, develop- Many of our programs involve the development and applica- mentandproductioncontractsonapercentageofcompletion tion of state-of-the-art technologies aimed at achieving chal- basisusingunits-of-deliveryasthebasistomeasureprogress lenging goals. As a result, setbacks, delays, cost growth and toward completing the contract and recognizing sales. For productfailurescanoccur. example, we use this method of revenue recognition on our We have entered into various joint venture, teaming and C-130J tactical transport aircraft program, Atlas and Proton other business arrangements to help support our portfolio of launchvehicleprograms,andMultipleLaunchRocketSystem productsandservicesinmanyofourlinesofbusiness.Some program.Forcertainotherlong-term,fixed-pricedevelopment of these business arrangements include foreign partners. The andproductioncontractsthat,alongwithotherfactors,require conduct of international business introduces other risks into ustodeliverminimalquantitiesoveralongerperiodoftimeor ouroperations,includingchangingeconomicconditions,fluc- toperformasubstantiallevelofdevelopmenteffortincompari- tuations in relative currency values, regulation by foreign sontothetotalvalueofthecontract,salesarerecordedwhen countries and the potential for unanticipated cost increases we achieve performance milestones or using the cost-to-cost resultingfromthepossibledeteriorationofpoliticalrelations. PAGE 2 2
-
Page 25
LockheedMartinCorporation method to measure progress toward completion. Under the Accountingfordesign,developmentandproductioncon- cost-to-cost method of accounting, we recognize sales based tractsrequiresjudgmentrelativetoassessingrisks,estimating ontheratioofcostsincurredtoourestimateoftotalcostsat contract revenues and costs, and making assumptions for completion. As examples, we use this methodology for our schedule and technical issues. Due to the size and nature of F-22 Raptor program and the AEGIS Weapon System pro- theworkrequiredtobeperformedonmanyofourcontracts, gram.Insomeinstances,long-termproductionprogramsmay theestimationoftotalrevenueandcostatcompletioniscom- require a significant level of development and/or a low level plicatedandsubjecttomanyvariables.Contractcostsinclude ofinitialproductionunitsintheirearlyphases,butwillulti- material,laborandsubcontractingcosts,aswellasanalloca- mately require delivery of increased quantities in later, full tionofindirectcosts.Assumptionshavetobemaderegarding rateproductionstages.Inthosecases,therevenuerecognition laborproductivityandavailability,thecomplexityofthework methodologymaychangefromthecost-to-costmethodtothe to be performed, the availability of materials, the length of units-of-delivery method after considering, among other timetocompletethecontract(toestimateincreasesinwages factors, program and production stability. As we incur costs and prices for materials), and the availability and timing of under cost-reimbursement-type contracts, we record sales. fundingfromthecustomer.Forcontractchangeorders,claims Cost-reimbursement-type contracts include time and materi- orsimilaritems,weapplyjudgmentinestimatingtheamounts als and other level-of-effort-type contracts. Examples of this andassessingthepotentialforrealization.Theseamountsare type of revenue recognition include the F-35 Joint Strike onlyincludedincontractvaluewhentheycanbereliablyesti- Fighter system development and demonstration (SDD) pro- mated and realization is considered probable. We have gramandtheTHAADmissiledefenseprogram.Mostofour accountingpoliciesinplacetoaddresstheseaswellasother long-term contracts are denominated in U.S. dollars, includ- contractual and business arrangements to properly account ing contracts for sales of military products and services to forlong-termcontracts. foreigngovernmentsconductedthroughtheU.S.Government Products and services provided under long-term design, (i.e.,foreignmilitarysales). developmentandproductioncontractsmakeupthemajorityof Asageneralrule,werecognizesalesandprofitsearlierin ourbusiness.Therefore,theamountswerecordinourfinan- aproductioncyclewhenweusethecost-to-costandmilestone cial statements using contract accounting methods and cost methods of percentage of completion accounting than when accountingstandardsarematerial.Becauseofthesignificance we use the units-of-delivery method. In addition, our profits of the judgments and estimation processes, it is likely that and margins may vary materially depending on the types of materiallydifferentamountscouldberecordedifweuseddif- long-term contracts undertaken, the costs incurred in their ferentassumptionsoriftheunderlyingcircumstanceswereto performance, the achievement of other performance objec- change.Forexample,ifunderlyingassumptionsweretochange tives,andthestageofperformanceatwhichtherighttoreceive such that our estimated profit at completion for all design, fees, particularly under incentive and award fee contracts, is developmentandproductioncontractswashigherorlowerby finallydetermined. 1%,ournetearningswouldincreaseordecreasebyapproxi- Incentives and award fees related to performance on mately$190million.Whenadjustmentsinestimatedcontract design,developmentandproductioncontracts,whicharegener- revenues or costs are required, any changes from prior esti- allyawardedatthediscretionofthecustomer,aswellaspenal- matesareincludedinearningsinthecurrentperiod. tiesrelatedtocontractperformance,areconsideredinestimating sales and profit rates. Estimates of award fees are based on AccountingforOtherServicesContracts actualawardsandanticipatedperformance.Incentiveprovisions Revenueundercontractsforservicesotherthanthoseassoci- which increase or decrease earnings based solely on a single atedwithdesign,developmentorproductionactivitiesisgen- significant event are generally not recognized until the event erally recognized either as services are performed or when occurs.Suchincentivesandpenaltiesarerecordedwhenthereis earned,dependingonthecontract.Thismethodologyismainly sufficientinformationforustoassessanticipatedperformance. used by our Information & Technology Services segment. PAGE 23
-
Page 26
LockheedMartinCorporation MANAGEMENT’SDISCUSSIONANDANALYSISOF FINANCIALCONDITIONANDRESULTSOFOPERATIONS December31,2005 Services contracts primarily include operations and mainte- PostretirementBenefitPlans nancecontracts,andoutsourcing-typearrangements.Revenue Mostemployeesarecoveredbydefinedbenefitpensionplans undersuchcontractsisgenerallyrecognizedonastraight-line (pensionplans),andweprovidehealthcareandlifeinsurance basisovertheperiodofcontractperformance,unlessevidence benefitstoeligibleretirees.Ourearningsmaybenegativelyor suggests that the revenue is earned or the obligations are ful- positively impacted by the amount of expense or income we filledinadifferentpattern.Costsincurredundertheseservices recordforouremployeebenefitplans.Thisisparticularlytrue contractsareexpensedasincurred,exceptthatinitial“set-up” withexpenseorincomeforpensionplansbecausethosecalcu- costsarecapitalizedandrecognizedoverthelifeoftheagree- lations are sensitive to changes in several key economic ment. Operating profit related to such services contracts may assumptions and workforce demographics. Effective January fluctuate from period to period, particularly in the earlier 1, 2006, new non-union represented employees that we hire phasesofthecontract.Incentivesandawardfeesrelatedtoper- arenotbeingcoveredbydefinedbenefitpensionplans,butare formance on services contracts are recognized when they are eligible to participate in defined contribution plans. We cur- fixedanddeterminable,generallyatthedateofaward. rentlyplantoofferthoseemployeestheabilitytoparticipatein our retiree medical plans, but will not subsidize the cost of OtherContractAccountingConsiderations theirparticipationeffectiveJanuary1,2006. Themajorityofoursalesaredrivenbypricingbasedoncosts We account for our pension plans using Statement of incurred to produce products or perform services under con- Financial Accounting Standards (FAS) 87, Employers’ tractswiththeU.S.Government.Cost-basedpricingisdeter- AccountingforPensions.Thoserulesrequirethattheamounts minedundertheFederalAcquisitionRegulations(FAR).The we record, including the expense or income for the plans, be FAR provides guidance on the types of costs that are allow- computedusingactuarialvaluations.Thesevaluationsinclude able in establishing prices for goods and services under U.S. manyassumptions,includingassumptionswemakerelatingto Governmentcontracts.Forexample,costssuchasthoserelated financial market and other economic conditions. Changes in to charitable contributions, advertising, interest expense, and keyeconomicindicatorscanresultinchangesintheassump- publicrelationsareunallowable,andthereforenotrecoverable tionsweuse.Thekeyyear-endassumptionsusedtoestimate throughsales.Inaddition,wemayenterintoagreementswith pensionexpenseorincomeforthefollowingcalendaryearare theU.S.Governmentthataddressthesubjectsofallowability thediscountrate,theexpectedlong-termrateofreturnonplan andallocabilityofcoststocontractsforspecificmatters.For assetsandtheratesofincreaseinfuturecompensationlevels. example,mostoftheamountswespendforgroundwatertreat- We use judgment in reassessing these assumptions each ment and soil remediation related to discontinued operations year because we have to consider current market conditions and sites operated in prior years are allocated to our current and, in the case of the expected long-term rate of return on operations as general and administrative costs under agree- planassets,pastinvestmentexperience,judgmentsaboutfuture mentsreachedwiththeU.S.Government. markettrends,changesininterestratesandequitymarketper- We closely monitor compliance with and the consistent formance.Wealsohavetoconsiderfactorslikethetimingand application of our critical accounting policies related to con- amounts of expected contributions to the plans and benefit tractaccounting.Businesssegmentpersonnelassessthestatus paymentstoplanparticipants. ofcontractsthroughperiodiccontractstatusandperformance An example of how changes in these assumptions can reviews. Also, regular and recurring evaluations of contract affectourfinancialstatementsoccurredin2005.Wereassess cost,schedulingandtechnicalmattersareperformedbyman- ourpensionplanassumptionseachyear.Basedonourreview agement personnel independent from the business segment ofinterestratesattheendoftheyear,weloweredourdiscount performingworkunderthecontract.Costsincurredandallo- rateassumptionto5.625%atDecember31,2005,comparedto catedtocontractswiththeU.S.Governmentarereviewedfor 5.75%usedattheendof2004.Beforetheendof2005,wealso compliance with regulatory standards by our personnel, and performedastudyoftheratesofincreaseinfuturecompensa- are subject to audit by the Defense Contract Audit Agency. tionlevels.Theresultsofthatstudyindicatedthatitwouldbe Forotherinformationonaccountingpolicieswehaveinplace appropriatetoreducethatratefrom5.50%to5.0%attheend for recognizing sales and profits, see our discussion under of2005.Thesechanges,togetherwithotherfactorssuchasthe “Salesandearnings”inNote1tothefinancialstatements. PAGE 2 4
-
Page 27
LockheedMartinCorporation effects of the actual return on plan assets over the past few Fundedamountsarerecoveredovertimethroughthepricing years, resulted in our projecting that the amount of pension of our products and services on U.S. Government contracts, expensefor2006willdecreasebyapproximately15%to20% andthereforearerecognizedinournetsales.Thetotalfund- ascomparedto2005expense.Theprimarydriversofthispro- ing requirement for pension plans under CAS in 2005 was jecteddecreasewerethechangeintherateoffuturecompen- $498million.For2006,weexpectourfundingrequirements sationincreasesaswellasthegrowthinplanassetsoverthe under CAS to increase. Also in 2006, funding in addition to pastyear,includingcontributionswemadetothepensiontrust. theamountcalculatedunderCASwilllikelyberequiredunder The decrease of 50 basis points in the compensation rate Internal Revenue Code rules. Any additional amounts com- decreasedtheestimated2006expensebyapproximately$100 puted under those rules are considered to be prepayments million.Inaddition,thehigherassetbaseatthebeginningof under the CAS rules, and are recorded on our balance sheet 2006droveahigherexpectedreturnonassetsfor2006,which andrecoveredinfutureperiods.In2005and2004,wemade was the main component of the remaining decrease in the discretionaryprepaymentsof$980millionand$485million, expense.Thisdecreasewaspartiallyoffsetbyanincreaseof respectively, to the pension trust. Prepayments reduce the approximately $50 million in the estimated 2006 pension amount of future cash funding that will be required. expense, resulting from the 12.5 basis point decrease in the Accordingly, although our CAS funding requirements are discount rate assumption. The annual review of our pension expectedtoincreaseoverthe$498millionrequiredin2005,we planassumptionsalsoaffectsthepensionliabilityrecordedin expect our cash contributions to the pension plans to be $100 ourbalancesheet. millionto$110million,primarilyreflectingtheadditionalfund- Attheendofeachofthelastfewyears,wehaverecorded ingrequiredunderInternalRevenueCoderules. noncashafter-taxadjustmentsinthestockholders’equitysec- The FAS/CAS pension adjustment represents the differ- tionofourbalancesheettoreflectaminimumpensionliabil- ence between pension expense calculated in accordance with ity for many of our pension plans. These adjustments were FAS87andpensioncostscalculatedandfundedinaccordance calculated on a plan-by-plan basis, and were determined by with CAS. Since the CAS expense is recovered through the comparingtheaccumulatedbenefitobligation(ABO)foreach pricingofourproductsandservicesonU.S.Governmentcon- plan to the fair value of that plan’s assets. The amount by tracts, and therefore recognized in a particular segment’s net whichtheABOexceedsthefairvalueoftheplanassets,after sales, the results of operations of our segments only include adjusting for previously recorded accrued or prepaid pension pensionexpenseasdeterminedandfundedinaccordancewith costfortheplan,mustberecordedasaminimumpensionlia- CAS rules. Accordingly, the FAS/CAS adjustment is an bility,withacorrespondingincreaseinanintangibleasset,if amountincludedinthereconciliationoftotalsegmentoperat- appropriate,andareductiontostockholders’equity.In2005, ing profit to consolidated operating profit under GAAP. See theminimumpensionliabilityadjustmentwerecordedreduced the discussion of “Net Unallocated Corporate (Expense) stockholders’ equity by $105 million primarily due to mini- Income”under“DiscussionofBusinessSegments.” mum pension liabilities associated with nonqualified benefit Inresponsetothepublic’sconcernovertheadequacyof plansandthechangesinassumptions.Attheendof2004,the pension plan funding, Congress has been drafting legislation adjustment reduced stockholders’ equity by $285 million, toaddresstheamountofannualcontributionsthatcompanies mainlydrivenbythechangeinthediscountrate.Theseadjust- arerequiredtopayintotheirpensionfunds.BoththeSenate ments did not impact earnings. The accumulated minimum and the House of Representatives have passed their own ver- pensionliabilitybalancesinstockholders’equityattheendof sionsofapensionfundingbillandthosebillsareexpectedto 2005 and 2004 were $(1,629) million and $(1,524) million, go to conference during the latter part of the first quarter of respectively.Theamountoftheminimumpensionliabilityis 2006.Itisexpectedthattheconferenceprocesswillproduce computed at each year-end and could decrease or increase compromisesandchangesintheSenateandHousebills,and dependingonchangesininterestratesandotherfactors. ultimatepassageofabillisuncertain.Thisuncertaintymakes U.S.GovernmentCostAccountingStandards(CAS)area itdifficulttoquantifythepotentialimpacttoourpensionfund- majorfactorindeterminingourpensionfundingrequirements ing.Generally,theSenateandHousebills,asdrafted,would andgoverntheextenttowhichourpensioncostsareallocable accelerate the required amount of our annual pension plan toandrecoverableundercontractswiththeU.S.Government. contributions,whichmayhaveamaterialimpactonourcash PAGE 25
-
Page 28
LockheedMartinCorporation MANAGEMENT’SDISCUSSIONANDANALYSISOF FINANCIALCONDITIONANDRESULTSOFOPERATIONS December31,2005 flowsforafewyearsbeginningin2007.Absentotherchanges, If we are ultimately found to have liability at those sites thesubsequentannualfundingrequirementswouldbeexpected wherewehavebeendesignatedaPRP,weexpectthattheactual todeclineinrecognitionoftheacceleratedcontributions. costs of remediation will be shared with other liable PRPs. Generally,PRPsthatareultimatelydeterminedtoberesponsi- EnvironmentalMatters blepartiesarestrictlyliableforsitecleanupandusuallyagree Weareapartytovariousagreements,proceedingsandpoten- amongthemselvestoshare,onanallocatedbasis,thecostsand tial proceedings for environmental cleanup issues, including expensesforinvestigationandremediationofhazardousmate- matters at various sites where we have been designated a rials. Under existing environmental laws, responsible parties potentially responsible party (PRP) by the EPA or by a state arejointlyandseverallyliableand,therefore,wearepotentially agency. We record financial statement accruals for environ- liable for the full cost of funding such remediation. In the mental matters in the period that it becomes probable that a unlikelyeventthatwewererequiredtofundtheentirecostof liabilityhasbeenincurredandtheamountscanbereasonably such remediation, the statutory framework provides that we estimated (see the discussion under “Environmental matters” may pursue rights of contribution from the other PRPs. The in Note 1 to the financial statements). Judgment is required amountswerecorddonotreflectthefactthatwemayrecover whenwedevelopassumptionsandestimatecostsexpectedtobe some of the environmental costs we have incurred through incurredforenvironmentalremediationactivitiesdueto,along insuranceorfromotherPRPs,whichwearerequiredtopursue with other factors, difficulties in assessing the extent of byagreementandU.S.Governmentregulation. environmentalremediationtobeperformed,complexenviron- Under agreements reached with the U.S. Government, mental regulations and remediation technologies, cost allow- someoftheamountswespendforgroundwatertreatmentand ability issues and agreements between PRPs to share in the soilremediationareallocatedtoouroperationsasgeneraland costofremediationasdiscussedbelow. administrative costs. Under existing government regulations, We enter into agreements (e.g., administrative orders, these and other environmental expenditures relating to our consentdecrees)whichdocumenttheextentandtimingofour U.S. Government business, after deducting any recoveries obligation. We are also involved in remediation activities at receivedfrominsuranceorotherPRPs,areallowableinestab- environmentalsiteswhereformalagreementsexistbutdonot lishingpricesofourproductsandservices.Asaresult,asub- quantifytheextentandtimingofourobligation.Environmental stantialamountoftheexpendituresweincurarebeingincluded cleanup activities usually cover several years, which makes in our sales and cost of sales according to U.S. Government estimating the costs more judgmental due to, for example, agreementorregulation. changing remediation technologies. To determine the costs Attheendof2005,thetotalamountofliabilitiesrecorded related to cleanup sites, we have to assess the extent of con- onourbalancesheetforenvironmentalmatterswas$464mil- tamination, the appropriate technology to be used to accom- lion. About 60% of the liability relates to sites in Redlands, plish the remediation and continually evolving regulatory Burbank and Glendale, California, and in Great Neck, New environmental standards. We consider these factors in our York,mainlyforremediationofsoilandgroundwatercontam- estimates of the timing and amount of any future costs that ination.Theremainderoftheliabilityrelatestootherproper- mayberequiredforremediationactions.Incaseswhereadate ties(includingcurrentoperatingfacilitiesandcertainfacilities tocompleteactivitiesataparticularenvironmentalsitecannot operated in prior years) for which our obligation is probable beestimatedbyreferencetoagreementsorotherwise,weproj- andthefinancialexposurecanbeestimated.Wehaverecorded ectcostsoveranappropriatetimeframenottoexceed20years. assetstotaling$353millionatDecember31,2005forthepor- Giventhelevelofjudgmentandestimationwhichhastooccur, tionofenvironmentalcoststhatareprobableoffuturerecov- itislikelythatmateriallydifferentamountscouldberecorded eryinpricingofourproductsandservicesforU.S.Government ifdifferentassumptionswereusedorifcircumstanceswereto businesses.Theamountthatisexpectedtobeallocatedtoour change(e.g.,achangeinenvironmentalstandards). commercial businesses has been expensed through cost of sales.AnyrecoverieswereceivefromotherPRPsorinsurance would reduce the allocated amounts included in our future U.S.Governmentsalesandcostofsales. PAGE 2 6
-
Page 29
LockheedMartinCorporation ACQUISITIONANDDIVESTITUREACTIVITIES three acquisitions was $180 million. Purchase accounting Wecontinuouslystrivetostrengthenourportfolioofproducts adjustmentsincludedrecordingcombinedgoodwillof$164mil- andservicestomeetthecurrentandfutureneedsofourcus- lion. These acquisitions were not material to our consolidated tomers. We accomplish this not only internally, through our resultsofoperationsfor2005.InJanuary2006,weacquired independent research and development activities, but also Aspen Systems Corporation, a U.S.-based company that throughacquisitions.Weselectivelypursuetheacquisitionof provides a range of business process and technology solu- businessesandinvestmentsthatcomplementourcurrentport- tions primarily to civil agencies of the U.S. Government. folioandallowexpansionintoadjacentproductlinesoraccess Thisacquisitionisnotexpectedtohaveamaterialimpact to new technologies. We have made a number of such niche onconsolidatedresultsofoperations,financialpositionor acquisitionsofbusinessesduringthepastseveralyears.Over cashflows. thelastfiveyears,wehavecompleted10suchacquisitionsfor an aggregate purchase price of approximately $1.5 billion. Divestitures Conversely,wemayalsoexplorethesaleofbusinesses,invest- During2005and2004,wecontinuedtoexecutethestrategyto mentsandsurplusrealestate.Ifweweretodecidetosellany monetizecertainofourequityinvestments,asfollows: suchbusinessesorrealestate,theresultinggains,ifany,would InJanuary2005,wecompletedthesaleofour25%inter- be recorded when the transactions are consummated and estinIntelsat,Ltd.toaprivateequityfirmfor$18.75pershare, losses,ifany,wouldberecordedwhenthevalueoftherelated or $752 million in total proceeds. The transaction resulted assetisdeterminedtobeimpaired. in the recording of a gain, net of state income taxes, of $47 millioninotherincomeandexpenses,andanincreaseinnet Acquisitions earningsof$31million($0.07pershare). In 2005, we completed the purchase of The SYTEX Group, In June 2005, Inmarsat plc (Inmarsat), a company in Inc.(SYTEX).Thetotalpurchaseprice,includingtransaction- which we held a 14% interest, completed an initial public relatedcosts,wasapproximately$480million.Approximately offering (IPO) of 150 million of its ordinary shares on the $380millionofthepurchasepricewaspaidincashatclosing, London Stock Exchange. The IPO had the effect of diluting with most of the remainder payable in 2006. The acquisition ourownershipto8.9%andwastheprimarydriverforourrec- was accounted for under the purchase method of accounting. ognition of a $42 million deferred gain that was recorded in Purchaseaccountingadjustmentswererecordedbyallocating 2003 related to this investment. In October 2005, we sold thepurchasepricetotheassetsacquiredandliabilitiesassumed approximately16millionofourInmarsatsharesfor$89mil- based on their estimated fair values, and included recording lion,furtherreducingourownershippercentageto5.3%.These goodwillof$395million,ofwhich$360millionwillbeamor- transactions resulted in the recording of gains, net of state tized for tax purposes. The acquisition expands the income taxes, totaling $126 million in other income and Corporation’s information technology solutions and technical expenses,andanincreaseinnetearningsof$82million($0.18 support services businesses with the DoD and other federal pershare).AtDecember31,2005,weheld24millionsharesof agencies. The operations of SYTEX are included in the Inmarsatwithatotalmarketvalueof$146million.InJanuary Information&TechnologyServicesbusinesssegment. 2006,wesoldanadditional12millionsharesofInmarsatfor In 2005, we also completed the acquisitions of STASYS $75million.Thegainisexpectedtoincrease2006netearnings Limited,aU.K.-basedtechnologyandconsultingfirmspecial- by$47million($0.11pershare). izinginnetworkcommunicationsanddefenseinteroperability; In the fourth quarter of 2005, we completed the sale of INSYS Group Limited, a U.K.-based diversified supplier of our interest in NeuStar, Inc. The transaction resulted in the military communications systems, weapons systems and recordingofagain,netofstateincometaxes,of$30million advancedanalysisservices;andCoherentTechnologies,Inc., inotherincomeandexpenses,andanincreaseinnetearnings aU.S.-basedsupplierofhigh-performance,laser-basedremote of$19million($0.04pershare). sensingsystems.Theaggregatecashpurchasepriceforthese PAGE 2 7
-
Page 30
LockheedMartinCorporation MANAGEMENT’SDISCUSSIONANDANALYSISOF FINANCIALCONDITIONANDRESULTSOFOPERATIONS December31,2005 In November 2004, a private equity firm purchased the increased in all segments except Aeronautics in 2005, where outstandingsharesofNewSkiesSatellites,N.V.(NewSkies). there was a slight decline due to an anticipated reduction in Wesoldoursharesfor$148million.Thetransactionresulted combataircraftdeliveries.TheU.S.Governmentisourlargest in the recording of a gain, net of state income taxes, of $91 customer, accounting for about 85% of our sales for 2005, millioninotherincomeandexpenses,andanincreaseinnet comparedto80%in2004and78%in2003. earningsof$59million($0.13pershare).Thecarryingvalue Otherincomeandexpenses,netwas$449millionfor2005 ofourinvestmentinNewSkieswasmarkedtomarketthrough comparedto$121millionin2004.Thiswasduetoanincrease othercomprehensiveincomepriortothesale. ininvestmentincome,gainsfromthesaleofinvestments(pri- marilyIntelsatandInmarsat)andchargesin2004fortheearly RESULTSOFOPERATIONS retirement of debt. Other income and expenses, net increased Sinceouroperatingcycleislong-termandinvolvesmanytypes $78millionfrom2003to2004duetogainsfromthesaleofthe ofdevelopmentandproductioncontractswithvaryingproduc- COMSATGeneralbusinessandtheinvestmentinNewSkies. tiondeliveryschedules,theresultsofoperationsofaparticular Ouroperatingprofitfor2005was$3.0billion,anincrease year,oryear-to-yearcomparisonsofrecordedsalesandprofits, of43%comparedto2004.Ouroperatingprofitfor2004was maynotbeindicativeoffutureoperatingresults.Thefollowing $2.1billion,anincreaseof3%comparedto2003. discussions of comparative results among periods should be Interest expense for 2005 was $370 million, $55 million viewedinthiscontext.Allpershareamountscitedinthisdis- lowerthanin2004.Interestexpensefor2004was$425million, cussionarepresentedona“perdilutedshare”basis. $62 million lower than the amount for 2003. The decrease in interestexpensewasduetoreductionsinourdebtoutstanding. Net Sales (In billions) Our effective tax rates were 30.2% for 2005, 23.9% for $40 2004and31.3%for2003.Foreachofthethreeyears,ourtax 35 rate was reduced from the statutory rate by the tax benefits relatedtoexportsalesandtaxdeductibledividends.For2005, 30 ourtaxratewasreducedbythenewtaxdeductionforsalesof 25 products manufactured in the U.S. For 2004, our tax rate 20 reflecteda$144millionreductioninourincometaxexpense 15 primarily resulting from the closure of an Internal Revenue I&TS 10 IS&S Service(IRS)examination. Space Systems 5 Electronic Systems Netearningsincreasedascomparedtotheprioryearfor 0 Aeronautics thefourthstraightyear.Wereportednetearningsof$1.8bil- 2005 2004 2003 lion($4.10pershare)in2005,comparedtonetearningsof$1.3 billion ($2.83 per share) in 2004 and earnings of $1.1 billion Thefollowingdiscussionofnetsalesandoperatingresults Segment Operating Profit ($2.34pershare)in2003. providesanoverviewofouroperationsbyfocusingonkeyele- (In millions) mentssetforthinourstatementofearnings.The“Discussion $3,500 DISCUSSIONOFBUSINESSSEGMENTS of Business 3,000 Segments” which follows describes the contribu- Weoperateinfivebusinesssegments:Aeronautics,Electronic tions of each of our business segments to our consolidated 2,500 Systems, Space Systems, Integrated Systems & Solutions salesandoperatingprofitfor2005,2004and2003.Wefollow 2,000 (IS&S)andInformation&TechnologyServices(I&TS). an integrated approach for managing the performance of our In the Aeronautics business segment, sales have leveled businessesandgenerallyfocusthediscussionofourresultsof 1,500 comparedtothegrowththathadbeenexperiencedthelastfew operationsaroundmajorlinesofbusiness,versusdistinguish- I&TS 1,000 years. This is largely due to lower sales on Combat Aircraft ing between products and services. As mentioned IS&S previously, 500 Space Systems programs driven by declines in F-16 volume, completion of mostofourservicesrevenuesaregeneratedinourInformation Electronic Systems Aeronautics initial ramp-up activities associated with F-35 development &TechnologyServicessegment. 0 2005 2004 2003 and F-22 production, and the completion of the F-22 For2005,netsaleswere$37.2billion,a5%increaseover Engineering and Manufacturing Development (EMD) phase 2004 sales. Sales for 2004 were $35.5 billion, an increase of oftheprogram.ThenumberofF-16deliveriesisexpectedto 12%comparedto2003.Sales,ascomparedtotheprioryear, ating Activities Net Cash Provided By Operating Activities (In millions) PAGE 2 8 $3,500 3,000
-
Page 31
LockheedMartinCorporation continuetodeclineoverthenextfewyears;however,withthe performance,andCorporatecostsnotallocatedtotheoperating GreekGovernment’scontractauthorizationfor30aircraft,firm segments,aswellasothermiscellaneousCorporateactivities. productioniscurrentlyplannedthrough2009.During2005,23 The FAS/CAS pension adjustment represents the differ- F-22s were delivered and the program achieved initial encebetweenpensionexpenseorincomecalculatedforfinan- operational capability, indicating its readiness for service. cial reporting purposes in accordance with FAS 87, and TheLot5contractfortheproductionof24aircraftisexpected pension costs calculated and funded in accordance with U.S. tocontinueproductionoftheF-22into2008,andwereceived GovernmentCAS,whicharereflectedinthebusinesssegment advancedprocurementcontractsforproductionofLots6and7 results.CASisamajorfactorindeterminingourpensionfund- associatedwithlongleadactivities.TheinitialF-35testaircraft ing requirements, and governs the extent of allocability and is being readied for its first flight and significant progress is recoverability of pension costs on government contracts. The beingmadeonthecarrier-basedandshorttakeoffvariantsas CASexpenseisrecoveredthroughthepricingofourproducts well. Activity on the C-130J program included 15 aircraft and services on U.S. Government contracts, and therefore deliveriesin2005.Through2005,wehavedelivered16ofthe recognized in segment net sales. The results of operations of 60 aircraft under the multi-year award, and production and thesegmentsonlyincludepensionexpenseasdeterminedand delivery of the remaining multi-year aircraft are expected to fundedinaccordancewithCASrules. continueinto2009. Thistableshowsnetsalesandoperatingprofitofthebusi- The Electronic Systems business segment has a broad nesssegmentsandreconcilestotheconsolidatedtotal. portfolio of products and services. Many of its activities involve a combination of both development and production (Inmillions) 2005 2004 2003 contractswithvaryingdeliveryschedules.Thisbusinessseg- NETSALES menthascontinuedtoexpanditscorecompetenciesasalead- Aeronautics $11,672 $11,785 $10,206 ing systems integrator, as demonstrated with its role as the ElectronicSystems 10,580 9,729 8,996 prime contractor on the Presidential Helicopter and Littoral SpaceSystems 6,820 6,359 6,024 CombatShipprograms. IntegratedSystems&Solutions 4,131 3,851 3,422 TheSpaceSystemsbusinesssegmentisakeysupplierof Information&TechnologyServices 4,010 3,802 3,176 spacesolutions,primarilytoourU.S.Governmentcustomers. $37,213 $35,526 $31,824 Growthwilldependonourgovernmentsatellitebusinessand OPERATINGPROFIT our ability to capture market share. The commercial satellite Aeronautics $ 994 $ 899 $ 690 andlaunchvehicleindustriescontinuetobeverycompetitive, ElectronicSystems 1,113 969 858 withresultingpricingpressures.During2005,thefinalTitan SpaceSystems 609 489 403 IV was launched and we now plan to continue to provide IntegratedSystems&Solutions 365 334 291 launch services to our U.S. Government customers with our Information&TechnologyServices 351 285 226 AtlasVvehiclethroughtheEELVprogram. Totalbusinesssegments 3,432 2,976 2,468 TheIS&SandI&TSbusinesssegmentscontinuetofocus NetunallocatedCorporateexpense (446) (887) (449) their capabilities in providing information technology ser- vices to defense, intelligence and other government custom- $ 2,986 $ 2,089 $ 2,019 ers. We expect continued strong growth in providing informationtechnologysolutionstogovernmentagencies. Thefollowingsegmentdiscussionsalsoincludeinforma- In the following table of financial data, total operating tion relating to negotiated backlog for each segment. Total profitofthebusinesssegmentsisreconciledtothecorrespond- negotiated backlog was approximately $75 billion and $74 ing consolidated amount. The reconciling item “Net unallo- billion at December 31, 2005 and 2004, respectively. This cated Corporate expense” includes the FAS/CAS pension amount included both funded backlog (unfilled firm orders adjustment (see discussion below), earnings and losses from forwhichfundinghasbeenbothauthorizedandappropriated equity investments, interest income, costs for certain stock- by the customer–Congress in the case of U.S. Government basedcompensationprograms,theeffectsofitemsnotconsid- agencies)andunfundedbacklog(firmordersforwhichfund- ered part of management’s evaluation of segment operating ing has not yet been appropriated). Negotiated backlog does PAGE 29
-
Page 32
LockheedMartinCorporation MANAGEMENT’SDISCUSSIONANDANALYSISOF FINANCIALCONDITIONANDRESULTSOFOPERATIONS December31,2005 not include unexercised options or task orders to be issued Net sales for Aeronautics decreased by $113 million, or under indefinite-delivery/indefinite-quantity (IDIQ) con- 1%,in2005comparedto2004.Thedecreasewasmainlydue tracts. Funded backlog was approximately $35 billion at Net Sales to anticipated declines in Combat Aircraft, which were par- December31,2005. (In billions) tiallyoffsetbygrowthinAirMobility.CombatAircraftsales The $40 Aeronautics segment generally includes fewer pro- decreased by $480 million for the year primarily due to grams that 35 have much larger sales and operating results than declines in F-16 volume, which more than offset higher F-35 programsincludedintheothersegments.Therefore,duetothe 30 andF-22volume.ThesalesgrowthinAirMobilitywasdueto largenumberofcomparativelysmallerprogramsintheremain- 25 additional C-130J deliveries (15 in 2005 compared to 13 in ing segments, the discussions of the results of operations of 2004)andhighervolumeonotherAirMobilityprograms. 20 these business segments generally focus on lines of business Net sales for Aeronautics increased by 15% in 2004 15 withinthesegmentsratherthanonspecificprograms.Thefol- I&TS comparedto2003.Themajorityoftheincreaseinsales,$1.5 10 lowingtablesoffinancialinformationandrelateddiscussions IS&S billion,wasduetohighervolumeontheF-35,F-16andF-22 Space Systems oftheresultsofoperationsofourbusinesssegmentsarecon- 5 Electronic Systems CombatAircraftprograms.In2004,83F-16sweredelivered, sistentwiththepresentationofsegmentinformationinNote16 0 Aeronautics 21 more than in 2003. The remaining increase in sales was 2005 2004 2003 tothefinancialstatements. mainly due to higher C-5 activities in Air Mobility. There were13C-130Jdeliveriesin2004comparedto15deliveries Segment Operating Profit in2003. (In millions) Operatingprofitforthesegmentincreasedby11%in2005 $3,500 comparedto2004.TheincreasewasduetohigherAirMobility 3,000 operating profit that exceeded a decline in Combat Aircraft 2,500 operatingprofit.AirMobilityoperatingprofitincreased$100 million mainly due to improved performance and increased 2,000 deliveriesontheC-130Jprogram.CombatAircraftoperating 1,500 profit declined due to decreased F-16 deliveries (69 in 2005 1,000 I&TS compared to 83 in 2004) and reduced earnings on the F-35 IS&S development program, which more than offset increased vol- 500 Space Systems Electronic Systems umeandimprovedperformanceontheF-22program. Aeronautics 0 Operating profit for the segment increased by 30% in 2005 2004 2003 2004 compared to 2003. Combat Aircraft operating profit increased$95millionprimarilyasaresultofhighersalesvol- ume on the programs discussed above and improved perfor- Aeronautics erating Activities Net Cash Provided By Operating Activities mance on the F-22 program. The remaining increase was Aeronautics’operatingresultsincludedthefollowing: (In millions) primarilyattributableto$85millioninoperatingprofitrecog- $3,500 (Inmillions) 2005 2004 2003 nizedontheC-130Jsdeliveredin2004.TheCorporationbegan 3,000 recognizingprofitsonC-130Jdeliveriesin2004uponresolu- Netsales $11,672 $11,785 $10,206 2,500 tionofcertaintechnicalaircraftperformancerisks,manufac- Operatingprofit 994 899 690 turing performance improvements and the achievement of Backlogatyear-end 2,000 29,580 30,489 37,580 stableproductionasaresultofsecuringamulti-yearcontract 1,500 in2003. 1,000 Backlogdecreasedin2005ascomparedto2004primar- ilyasaresultofsalesvolumeontheF-35andF-16programs 500 aswellasdeliveriesofC-130Jaircraft. 0 2005 2004 2003 tio Debt-To-Total Capital Ratio Return On Invested Capital Revised Return On In (In percent) 50% 0.15 15% PAGE 3 0 40% 0.12 12%
-
Page 33
LockheedMartinCorporation ElectronicSystems SpaceSystems ElectronicSystems’operatingresultsincludedthefollowing: SpaceSystems’operatingresultsincludedthefollowing: (Inmillions) 2005 2004 2003 (Inmillions) 2005 2004 2003 Netsales $10,580 $ 9,729 $ 8,996 Netsales $ 6,820 $ 6,359 $ 6,024 Operatingprofit 1,113 969 858 Operatingprofit 609 489 403 Backlogatyear-end 19,932 18,239 17,339 Backlogatyear-end 15,925 16,112 12,813 NetsalesforElectronicSystemsincreased9%in2005as Net sales for Space Systems increased by 7% in 2005 comparedto2004.Highervolumeintacticalandsurfacesys- comparedto2004.Duringtheyear,salesgrowthinSatellites temsprogramscontributedtoincreasedsalesof$495million and Strategic & Defensive Missile Systems (S&DMS) offset atMaritimeSystems&Sensors(MS2).Platform,Training& declines in Launch Services. The $410 million increase in Transportation Solutions (PT&TS) sales increased $310 mil- Satellitessaleswasduetohighervolumeongovernmentsatel- lion primarily due to platform integration activities. Air liteprogramsthatmorethanoffsetdeclinesincommercialsat- defense and fire control programs contributed to increased elliteactivities.Therewerenocommercialsatellitedeliveries salesof$40millionatMissiles&FireControl(M&FC). in 2005, compared to four in 2004. Increased sales of $235 NetsalesforElectronicSystemsincreased8%in2004as millioninS&DMSwereattributabletothefleetballisticmis- compared to 2003. The increase in sales was due to higher sileandmissiledefenseprograms.The$180milliondecrease volumeinMS2andM&FC.Highervolumeonsurfacesystems inLaunchServices’saleswasmainlyduetohavingthreeAtlas programs accounted for most of MS2’s sales growth of $450 launchesin2005comparedtosixin2004. million.M&FC’ssalesincreased$265million,primarilydue Net sales for Space Systems increased by 6% in 2004 tohighervolumeonfirecontrolandtacticalmissileprograms. compared to 2003, as increases in Satellites of $320 million Operating profit for the segment increased by 15% in and S&DMS of $75 million more than offset a $55 million 2005 compared to 2004. Operating profit increased by $80 decreaseinLaunchServices.TheincreaseinSatelliteswasdue millionatM&FCmainlyduetoimprovedperformanceonfire toincreasedvolumeongovernmentsatelliteprogramsandone controlandairdefenseprograms.Performanceonsurfacesys- additional commercial satellite delivery in 2004. In S&DMS, temsprogramscontributedtoanincreaseinoperatingprofitof theincreasewasprimarilyattributabletofleetballisticmissile $50 million at MS2. PT&TS operating profit increased $10 programs. The lower volume in Launch Services was mainly millionprimarilyduetoimprovedperformanceonsimulation due to a decline in the Titan launch vehicle program, which andtrainingprograms. morethanoffsetincreasesinbothAtlaslaunches(sixin2004 Operating profit for the segment increased by 13% in comparedtofivein2003)andProtonlaunches(fourin2004 2004comparedto2003.Operatingprofitincreased$145mil- comparedtotwoin2003). lionduetoimprovedperformanceontacticalmissileandfire Operating profit for the segment increased 25% in 2005 control programs at M&FC and on radar programs at MS2. compared to 2004. Operating profit increased in Launch ThedecreaseinoperatingprofitatPT&TSwasduetoa$25 Services,S&DMSandSatellites.InLaunchServices,the$60 millionlossprovisionrecordedinthethirdquarterof2004on millionincreaseinoperatingprofitwasprimarilyattributable certaininternationalsimulationandtrainingcontracts. to improved performance on the Atlas vehicle program. The increase in backlog during 2005 over 2004 resulted Satellites’ operating profit increased $35 million due to the fromincreasedordersondevelopmentprograms. higher volume and improved performance on government satellite programs, which more than offset the decreased operating profit due to the decline in commercial satellite deliveries.The$20millionincreaseinS&DMSwasattribut- able to higher volume on fleet ballistic missile and missile defenseprograms. PAGE 31
-
Page 34
LockheedMartinCorporation MANAGEMENT’SDISCUSSIONANDANALYSISOF FINANCIALCONDITIONANDRESULTSOFOPERATIONS December31,2005 Operatingprofitforthesegmentincreased21%in2004as Information&TechnologyServices comparedto2003.LaunchServices’operatingprofitincreased Information&TechnologyServices’operatingresultsincluded $65 million. This increase was primarily due to U.S. thefollowing: Government support of the Atlas program and the benefit resultingfromthefirstquarterterminationofalaunchvehicle (Inmillions) 2005 2004 2003 contract by a commercial customer, offset by a decline in Netsales $4,010 $3,802 $3,176 activitiesontheTitanlaunchvehicleprogram.Satellites’oper- Operatingprofit 351 285 226 atingprofitincreased$20millionduetocommercialsatellite Backlogatyear-end 5,414 4,560 4,817 deliveries, partially offset by lower profitability on a govern- mentsatelliteprogram.In2003,governmentsatellitesoperat- NetsalesforI&TSincreasedby5%in2005ascompared ing profit reflected a $30 million charge related to a NASA to 2004. The increase in sales was primarily attributable to satelliteprogram. higher volumes of $460 million in Information Technology The decrease in backlog during 2005 as compared to andDefenseServices,whichmorethanoffsetasalesdecline 2004wasmainlyduetosalesrelatedtogovernmentsatellite of$250millioninNASAprograms.InformationTechnology’s programs. sales increase includes the impact of organic growth and the purchaseofSYTEXinMarch2005. IntegratedSystems&Solutions Net sales for I&TS increased by 20% in 2004 as com- IntegratedSystems&Solutions’operatingresultsincludedthe paredto2003.Theincreaseinsaleswasprimarilyattributable following: tohighervolumeof$510millioninInformationTechnology. Information Technology’s sales improved due to organic (Inmillions) 2005 2004 2003 growth,aswellasthenetimpactofourpurchaseofAffiliated Netsales $4,131 $3,851 $3,422 Computer Services’ federal government IT business and the Operatingprofit 365 334 291 concurrent sale of our commercial IT business in November Backlogatyear-end 3,974 4,586 4,350 2003. The remaining increase in sales of $120 million was primarily attributable to higher volume in Defense Services, NetsalesforIS&Sincreasedby7%in2005ascompared whichoffsetadeclineinNASAsales. to 2004 and by 13% in 2004 as compared to 2003. For both Operating profit for the segment increased by 23% in comparativeperiods,thesalesincreaseswereprimarilyattrib- 2005ascomparedto2004.Theoperatingprofitincreasewas utabletoahighervolumeofintelligence,defenseandinforma- mainly due to higher volume and improved performance tionassuranceactivities. inInformationTechnologyandDefenseServices. Operatingprofitforthesegmentincreased9%in2005as Operating profit for the segment increased by 26% in comparedto2004andby15%in2004ascomparedto2003. 2004ascomparedto2003.Theoperatingprofitincreasewas Theincreasesinoperatingprofitforbothcomparativeperiods mainly due to Information Technology volume and program wereprimarilyattributabletohighervolumeandperformance performance. improvementsontheactivitiesdescribedabove. Theincreaseinbacklogwasattributabletogrowthinour The decrease in backlog during 2005 compared to 2004 InformationTechnologylineofbusiness. wasduetotheU.S.Army’sterminationforconvenienceofthe AerialCommonSensorcontract. PAGE 32
-
Page 35
LockheedMartinCorporation UnallocatedCorporate(Expense)Income,Net recorded related to the early repayment of debt, are not Thefollowingtableshowsthecomponentsofnetunallocated consideredbymanagementinevaluatingtheoperatingperfor- Corporate(expense)income. mance of business segments. Therefore, for purposes of segment reporting, the following items were included in (Inmillions) 2005 2004 2003 “UnallocatedCorporate(expense)income,net”for2005,2004 FAS/CASpensionadjustment $(626) $(595) $(300) and2003: Itemsnotconsideredinsegment Operating Net Earnings operatingperformance 173 (215) (153) Profit Earnings (Loss) Other,net 7 (77) 4 (Inmillions,exceptpersharedata) (Loss) (Loss) PerShare $(446) $(887) $(449) YEARENDEDDECEMBER31,2005 GainsrelatedtoInmarsat The FAS/CAS pension adjustment represents the differ- transactions $126 $ 82 $0.18 ence between pension costs calculated and funded in accor- Gainonsaleofinterestin dancewithCASandpensionexpensedeterminedinaccordance Intelsat 47 31 0.07 withFAS87.Thatdifferenceisnotincludedinsegmentoper- Gainonsaleofinterestin atingresultsandthereforeisareconcilingitembetweenoper- NeuStar 30 19 0.04 ating profit from the business segments and consolidated Impairmentchargerelated operatingprofit.TheCASfundingamountisallocatedamong toasatellite (30) (19) (0.04) the business segments and is included as an expense item in $173 $113 $0.25 thesegments’costofgoodssold.Amajorityofthecostisalso YEARENDEDDECEMBER31,2004 passedalongtoourcustomersthroughcontractpricing,andis ChargeforPit9litigation $(180) $(117) $(0.26) consequentlyincludedinthesegments’sales. Chargeforearlyretirement The following table shows the CAS funding that is ofdebt (154) (100) (0.22) included as expense in the segments’ operating results, the Gainonsaleofinterestin related FAS (expense) income, and the resulting FAS/CAS NewSkies 91 59 0.13 pensionadjustment: GainonsaleofCOMSAT (Inmillions) 2005 2004 2003 Generalbusiness 28 4 0.01 Benefitfromclosureofan FAS87expense $(1,124) $(884) $(484) IRSexamination — 144 0.32 Less:CASexpenseandfunding (498) (289) (184) $(215) $ (10) $(0.02) FAS/CASpensionadjustment— expense $ (626) $(595) $(300) YEARENDEDDECEMBER31,2003 Chargeforearlyretirement AsdisclosedinNote13tothefinancialstatements,FAS ofdebt $(146) $ (96) $(0.21) 87 expense increased primarily due to higher recognized net Chargerelatedtoexitfromthe commercialmailsorting actuariallossesandhigherservicecostin2005,andduetoa business (41) (27) (0.06) lowerexpectedreturnonplanassetsinadditiontotheseother Gainonpartialreversalof twofactorsin2004. SpaceImagingcharge 19 13 0.03 Certainitemsareexcludedfromsegmentresultsaspartof Gainonsaleofthecommercial senior management’s evaluation of segment operating perfor- ITbusiness 15 8 0.02 manceconsistentwiththemanagementapproachpromulgated byFAS131,DisclosuresaboutSegmentsofanEnterpriseand $(153) $(102) $(0.22) RelatedInformation.Forexample,gainsandlossesrelatedto the disposition of businesses or investments managed by Corporate,aswellasotherCorporateactivitiessuchascharges PAGE 33
-
Page 36
$40 35 LockheedMartinCorporation 30 MANAGEMENT’SDISCUSSIONANDANALYSISOF 25 FINANCIALCONDITIONANDRESULTSOFOPERATIONS 20 December31,2005 15 I&TS 10 IS&S Space Systems 5 Theincreaseinthe“Other,net”componentofunallocated Electronic Systems Thefocusonimprovingourcashmanagementprocessescontin- 0 Aeronautics Corporate(expense)income,netof$84millionfrom2004to 2005 2004 2003 uestocontributetotheaggregatereductioninoperatingwork- 2005 was primarily due to higher interest income due to a ingcapitalaccounts(receivables,inventories,accountspayable, largerinvestedcashbalanceandhigherinterestratesin2005. andcustomeradvancesandamountsinexcessofcostsincurred), Segment Operating Profit Thedecreaseof$81millionfrom2003to2004wasprimarily (In millions) including an aggregate reduction of $106 million in 2005 as duetolowerearningsonourequityinvestmentsin2004. $3,500 comparedtoareductionof$492millionin2004.Althoughwe will continue to focus on management of operating working 3,000 LIQUIDITYANDCASHFLOWS capital accounts, we do not expect the rate of improvements Wehaveabalancedcashdeploymentanddisciplinedgrowth 2,500 wehaveexperiencedinpriorperiodstocontinue. strategytoenhanceourbusinesses,increaseshareholdervalue 2,000 and position ourselves to take advantage of new business InvestingActivities 1,500 opportunities when they arise. Consistent with that strategy, Capitalexpenditures—Capitalexpendituresforproperty,plant we have1,000 invested in our business (e.g., capitalI&TS expenditures, and equipment amounted to $865 million in 2005, $769 mil- IS&S independent500 research and development), repurchased Space shares, Systems lionin2004and$687millionin2003.Weexpectourcapital Electronic Systems increased our dividends, opportunistically reduced our debt expenditurestoincreaseoverthenexttwoyearsconsistentwith 0 Aeronautics andmadeselectacquisitionsofbusinesses.Thefollowingpro- 2005 2004 2003 the expected growth in our business and to support specific videsanoverviewofourexecutionofthisstrategy. programrequirements. Acquisitions,divestituresandotheractivities—Wehaveapro- perating Activities Net Cash Provided By Operating Activities cess to selectively identify businesses for acquisition that (In millions) meet our financial targets and disciplined growth strategy. $3,500 Wehavefocusedongovernmentinformationtechnologypro- 3,000 viders,systemsintegratorsandcomplementarytechnologies. 2,500 Wepaid$564millionforfourbusinessesin2005,$91mil- 2,000 lion for two businesses in 2004 and $645 million for two businessesin2003. 1,500 During 2005, we received proceeds of $935 million from 1,000 the divestiture of non-core equity investments. The proceeds 500 included$752millionfromthesaleofourinvestmentinIntelsat, Ltd., $140 million from the sale of Inmarsat shares and the 0 2005 2004 2003 redemptionofcertainInmarsatequity-relatedinvestments,and $33millionfromthesaleofourNeuStarinvestment. During2004,NewSkiesSatellites,N.V.wassoldtoapri- OperatingActivities vate equityReturn firm.OnOur portion of the proceeds was $148 mil- Return On I atio Debt-To-Total Capital Ratio Invested Capital Revised Net cash provided by operating activities increased by $270 (In percent) lion,$140millionofwhichwasreceivedin2004.Alsoduring millionto$3.2billionin2005ascomparedto2004afterhav- 50% 2004, we0.15received cash from Inmarsat Group Holdings, 15% Ltd. ing increased by $1.1 billion to $2.9 billion in 2004 as com- amounting to $50 million which reduced the amount of our paredto2003.In2005,theincreasewasprimarilyattributable 40% 0.12 investment.In2003,InmarsatVentures,Ltd.wasacquiredby 12% toanincreaseinnetearningsof$559millionascomparedto a consortium of private equity firms in a leveraged buyout 2004, which 30% more than offset a $386 million reduction in 0.09 transaction.Inexchangeforourinterest,wereceivedcashof 9% workingcapitalimprovementsbetweentheyears.In2004,the $114 million and retained an ownership interest in 6%the new 20% 0.06 increasewasattributabletoanincreaseinnetearningsof$213 Inmarsat holding company, Inmarsat Group Holdings, Ltd., million, and also to an increase in working capital improve- valued at 10% 0.03$96 million. Also in 2003, we paid $1303% million ments of $799 million compared to 2003. The remaining relatedtoourguaranteeofSpaceImaging,LLC’sborrowings increaseincashbetweentheperiodswasduetothetimingof 0% underitscreditfacility. 0.00 0% income tax payments 2005 and2004 various other 2003 operating activities. 2005 2004 (1) Calculation was revise the Consolidated Finan Summary on page 74 f PAGE 34 on the calculation.
-
Page 37
3000 3,000 2500 2,500 LockheedMartinCorporation 2000 2,000 1500 1,500 1000 1,000 I&TS IS&S 500 500 Space Systems Electronic Systems 0 0 Aeronautics FinancingActivities quarterlydividendsof$0.12pershareduringeachofthefirst 2005 2004 2003 Issuance and repayment of long-term debt—Cash provided three quarters of the year and $0.22 per share for the last from operations has been our principal source of funds to quarterof2003. reduce our long-term debt. In 2005, we used $133 million of Net Cash Provided by Operating Activities Net Cash Provided By Operating Activities cashfortheearlyretirementandscheduledrepaymentoflong- (In millions) CAPITALSTRUCTUREANDRESOURCES (In millions) termdebt.In2004,weused$1.1billionofcashfortheearly 3500 At December $3,500 31, 2005 our total long-term debt amounted to retirementandscheduledrepaymentoflong-termdebt.Ofthat $5.0billion.Ourlong-termdebtisalmostentirelyintheform 3000 3,000 amount, $951 million related to the early retirement of debt of publicly issued notes and debentures. The majority of our through tender offers for which2500 we incurred $163 million of long-termdebtbearsinterestatfixedrates;however,$1.0bil- 2,500 associated costs. In 2003, we issued 2000 $1.0 billion of floating lion of convertible 2,000 debentures issued in 2003 have a floating rate convertible senior debentures that bear interest at three- interestratebasedonLIBOR.In2005,werepaid$133million 1500 1,500 monthLIBORless25basispoints,resetquarterly.Weusedthe of long-term debt, including scheduled and early debt repay- 1,000 1000 proceedsofthatissuance,alongwithcashfromoperations,to ments. Through our repayment activities, our long-term debt repay$2.2billionofdebtinadvanceofitsmaturityandretire 500 balancehasdeclinedoverthelastfiveyearsfrom$9.9billion 500 other high cost debt. We used $175 million of cash for debt atDecember31,2000.Weimprovedourdebt-to-totalcapital- 0 0 issuance and repayment costs to complete those transactions ization ratio from 200558% at December 2004 200331, 2000 to 39% at in2003. December31,2005. Sharerepurchasesanddividends—Wealsousedcashineach Debt-To-Total Capital Ratio Debt-To-Total Capital Ratio (In percent) ofthelastthreeyearsforcommonsharerepurchaseactivityas 0.5 50% follows: $1,222 million for 19.7 million common shares in 2005, of which $1,211 million for 19.5 million of those com- 0.4 40% mon shares, as well as $99 million for 1.8 million common shares purchased in 2004, was settled 0.3 during the year; $772 30% millionfor14.7millioncommonsharesin2004,ofwhich$673 millionfor12.9millioncommonshareswassettledduringthe 0.2 20% year; and $482 million in 2003 for 10.7 million common shares. These purchases were made 0.1 under a share repurchase 10% programinplacefortherepurchaseofupto88millionshares ofourcommonstockfromtime-to-timeatmanagement’sdis- 0.0 0% 2005 2004 2003 cretion, including 45 million shares that were authorized for repurchase under the program in September 2005. As of Our stockholders’ equity amounted to $7.9 billion at December31,2005,wehadrepurchasedatotalof46.1million December 31, 2005, an increase of $846 million from shares under the program, and there remained approximately December31,2004.Theincreasecamefromnetearningsand 41.9millionsharesthatmayberepurchasedinthefuture. stock plan activities partially offset by our share repurchases Thepaymentofdividendsonourcommonsharesisoneof andpaymentofdividends. thekeycomponentsofourbalancedcashdeploymentstrategy. Returnoninvestedcapital(ROIC)improvedby370basis Shareholders were paid cash dividends of $462 million in pointsduring2005to14.5%.WedefineROICasnetincome 2005,$405millionin2004and$261millionin2003.Wehave plusafter-taxinterestexpensedividedbyaverageinvestedcap- increasedourquarterlydividendrateineachofthelastthree ital(stockholders’equityplusdebt),afteradjustingstockhold- years.Wepaidaquarterlydividendof$0.25pershareduring ers’ equity by adding back our minimum pension liability eachofthefirstthreequartersof2005and$0.30persharefor balance. We believe that reporting ROIC provides investors thelastquarterof2005.Wepaidaquarterlydividendof$0.22 with greater visibility into how effectively Lockheed Martin per share during each of the first three quarters of 2004 and uses the capital invested in its operations. We use ROIC to $0.25pershareforthelastquarterof2004.In2003,wepaid evaluate multi-year investment decisions and as a long-term PAGE 35
-
Page 38
LockheedMartinCorporation MANAGEMENT’SDISCUSSIONANDANALYSISOF FINANCIALCONDITIONANDRESULTSOFOPERATIONS December31,2005 performancemeasure.WealsouseROICasafactorinevalu- andbearinterestatratesbased,atouroption,ontheEurodollar atingmanagementperformanceundercertainofourincentive rateorabankBaseRate(asdefined).Eachbank’sobligation compensation plans. The adjustment to add back the mini- to make loans under the credit facility is subject to, among mumpensionliabilityisarevisiontoourcalculationin2005 other things, our compliance with various representations, which we believe more closely links ROIC to management warranties and covenants, including covenants limiting our performance. abilityandtheabilityofcertainofoursubsidiariestoencum- ROICisnotameasureoffinancialperformanceundergen- berourassets,andacovenantnottoexceedamaximumlever- erallyacceptedaccountingprinciplesintheU.S.,andmaynot age ratio. We cancelled our $500 million 364-day credit bedefinedandcalculatedbyothercompaniesinthesameman- facilityonJune17,2005. ner.ROICshouldnotbeconsideredinisolationorasanalterna- Wehaveagreementsinplacewithbankinginstitutionsto tivetonetearningsasanindicatorofperformance.SeeNote(f) providefortheissuanceofcommercialpaper.Therewereno to the Consolidated Financial Data—Five Year Summary on commercial paper borrowings outstanding at December 31, page74foradditionalinformationconcerninghowwecalculate 2005. If we were to issue commercial paper, the borrowings ROIC.Thatinformationreflectstherevisiontothecalculationas wouldbesupportedbythe$1.5billioncreditfacility. discussedintheprecedingparagraphforallperiodspresented. We have an effective shelf registration statement on file withtheSecuritiesandExchangeCommissiontoprovidefor ital Revised Return On Invested Capital Ratio(1) theissuanceofupto$1billionindebtsecurities.Ifwewere toissuedebtunderthisshelfregistration,wewouldexpectto 15% use the net proceeds for general corporate purposes. These purposes may include repayment of debt, working capital 12% needs,capitalexpenditures,acquisitionsandanyothergeneral 9% corporatepurpose. Weactivelyseektofinanceourbusinessinamannerthat 6% preserves financial flexibility while minimizing borrowing costs to the extent practicable. Our management continually 3% reviewschangesinfinancial,marketandeconomicconditions tomanagethetypes,amountsandmaturitiesofourindebted- 0% ness. We may at times refinance existing indebtedness, vary 2005 2004 2003 our mix of variable-rate and fixed-rate debt, or seek alterna- (1) Calculation was revised in 2005. See Note (f) to the Consolidated Financial Data—Five Year tivefinancingsourcesforourcashandoperationalneeds. Summary on page 74 for additional information Cash and cash equivalents, short-term investments, cash on the calculation. flow from operations and other available financing resources are expected to be sufficient to meet anticipated operating, At December 31, 2005, we had in place a $1.5 billion capital expenditure and debt service requirements, as well as ated Backlog revolvingcreditfacilitywhichexpiresinJuly2010.Therewere Negotiated Backlog acquisitionandotherdiscretionaryinvestmentneeds,projected ns) (In billions) noborrowingsoutstandingunderthefacilityatDecember31, overthenextthreeyears. $80 2005.Borrowingsunderthecreditfacilitywouldbeunsecured 70 60 50 40 30 I&TS 20 IS&S Space Systems 10 Electronic Systems 0 Aeronautics 2005 2004 2003 PAGE 36
-
Page 39
LockheedMartinCorporation CONTRACTUALCOMMITMENTSAND andthecustomerterminatedthecontractforconvenience,any OFF-BALANCESHEETARRANGEMENTS amountswewouldberequiredtopaytosettletherelatedcom- At December 31, 2005, we had contractual commitments to mitments,aswellasamountspreviouslyincurred,wouldgen- repaydebt,makepaymentsunderoperatingleases,settleobli- erallybereimbursedbythecustomer.Thiswouldalsobetrue gationsrelatedtoagreementstopurchasegoodsandservices, incaseswhereweperformsub-contractworkforaprimecon- andsettleotherlong-termliabilities.Capitalleaseobligations tractorunderaU.S.Governmentcontract.Theterminationfor were negligible. Payments due under these long-term obliga- conveniencelanguagemayalsobeincludedincontractswith tionsandcommitmentsareasfollows: foreign,stateandlocalgovernments.Inaddition,wehavecon- tractswithcustomersthatdonotincludeterminationforcon- PaymentsDueByPeriod venience provisions, including contracts with commercial LessThan 1–3 3–5 After customers. (Inmillions) Total 1Year Years Years 5Years Total purchase obligations in the preceding table related Long-termdebt (a) $ 4,986 $ 202 $ 136 $ 248 $4,400 tocapitalexpendituresgenerallyincludeamountsforfacilities Operatinglease andequipmentatvariousofourlocations,relatedtocustomer obligations 1,157 261 386 262 248 contracts. Purchaseobligations Amounts related to “Other long-term liabilities” in the Operating preceding table represent the contractual obligations for cer- activities 23,566 11,001 7,880 2,752 1,933 tain long-term liabilities recorded as of December 31, 2005. Capital Such amounts mainly include expected payments under expenditures 462 344 118 — — deferredcompensationplans,non-qualifiedpensionplansand Otherlong-term environmentalliabilities.Obligationsrelatedtoenvironmental liabilities 1,289 213 256 169 651 liabilitiesrepresentourestimateofremediationpaymentobli- Totalcontractual gations under government consent decrees and agreements, cashobligations $31,460 $12,021 $ 8,776 $3,431 $7,232 excludingamountsreimbursedbytheU.S.Governmentinits (a) Long-termdebtincludesscheduledprincipalpaymentsonly. capacityasapotentiallyresponsiblepartyunderanagreement enteredintoin2000. Generally, our long-term debt obligations are subject to, We also may enter into industrial participation agree- along with other things, compliance with certain covenants, ments,sometimesreferredtoasoffsetagreements,asacondi- includingcovenantslimitingourabilityandtheabilityofcer- tion to obtaining orders for our products and services from tainofoursubsidiariestoencumberourassets. certain customers in foreign countries. These agreements are Purchaseobligationsrelatedtooperatingactivitiesinclude designedtoenhancethesocialandeconomicenvironmentof agreements and requirements contracts that give the supplier the foreign country by requiring the contractor to promote recourse to us for cancellation or nonperformance under the investmentinthecountry.Offsetagreementsmaybesatisfied contract or contain terms that would subject us to liquidated throughactivitiesthatdonotrequireustousecash,including damages.Suchagreementsandcontractsmay,forexample,be transferring technology, providing manufacturing and other related to direct materials, obligations to sub-contractors and consultingsupporttoin-countryprojects,andthepurchaseby outsourcing arrangements. Total purchase obligations in the third parties (e.g., our vendors) of supplies from in-country preceding table include approximately $22 billion related to vendors.Theseagreementsmayalsobesatisfiedthroughour contractualcommitmentsenteredintoasaresultofcontracts useofcashforsuchactivitiesaspurchasingsuppliesfromin- we have with our U.S. Government customers. However, the country vendors, providing financial support for in-country U.S. Government would generally be required to pay us for projects,andbuildingorleasingfacilitiesforin-countryoper- anycostsweincurrelativetothesecommitmentsiftheywere ations.Wedonotcommittooffsetagreementsuntilordersfor toterminatetherelatedcontracts“forconvenience”pursuant ourproductsorservicesaredefinitive.Offsetprogramsgener- to FAR. For example, if we had commitments to purchase allyextendoverseveralyearsandmayprovideforpenaltiesin goodsandservicesthatwereenteredintoasaresultofaspe- theeventwefailtoperforminaccordancewithoffsetrequire- cificcontractwereceivedfromourU.S.Governmentcustomer ments. No such penalties have been incurred during the last PAGE 37
-
Page 40
LockheedMartinCorporation MANAGEMENT’SDISCUSSIONANDANALYSISOF FINANCIALCONDITIONANDRESULTSOFOPERATIONS December31,2005 five years. The amounts ultimately applied against our offset At December 31, 2005, we had no material off-balance agreements are based on negotiations with the customer and sheetarrangementsasthosearrangementsaredefinedbythe generallyrequirecashoutlaysthatrepresentonlyafractionof SecuritiesandExchangeCommission(SEC). theoriginalamountintheoffsetagreement.AtDecember31, 2005,wehadoutstandingoffsetagreementstotaling$8.4bil- QUANTITATIVEANDQUALITATIVEDISCLOSURE lion,primarilyrelatedtoourAeronauticssegment,thatextend OFMARKETRISK through 2015. To the extent we have entered into purchase Ourmainexposuretomarketriskrelatestointerestratesand obligationsatDecember31,2005thatalsosatisfyoffsetagree- foreign currency exchange rates. Our financial instruments ments,thoseamountsareincludedintheprecedingtable. thataresubjecttointerestrateriskprincipallyincludefixed- We have entered into standby letter of credit agreements rateandfloatingratelong-termdebt.Ifinterestrateswereto andotherarrangementswithfinancialinstitutionsandcustom- changebyplusorminus1%,interestexpensewouldincrease ersmainlyrelatingtoadvancesreceivedfromcustomersand/or ordecreasebyapproximately$10millionrelatedtoourfloat- theguaranteeoffutureperformanceonsomeofourcontracts. ing rate debt. The estimated fair values of the Corporation’s At December 31, 2005, we had outstanding letters of credit, long-termdebtinstrumentsatDecember31,2005aggregated suretybondsandguarantees,asfollows: approximately$6.2billion,comparedwithacarryingamount of approximately $5.0 billion. The majority of our long-term CommitmentExpirationByPeriod debtobligationsarenotcallableuntilmaturity.Wehaveused Less After interestrateswapsinthepasttomanageourexposuretofixed Total Than 1–3 3–5 5 andvariableinterestrates;however,atyear-end2005,wehad (Inmillions) Commitment 1Year (a) Years (a) Years Years nosuchagreementsinplace. Standbyletters Weuseforwardforeignexchangecontractstomanageour ofcredit $2,630 $2,425 $171 $18 $16 exposure to fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates, Suretybonds 434 79 352 3 — anddosoinwaysthatqualifyforhedgeaccountingtreatment. Guarantees 2 1 1 — — Theseexchangecontractshedgethefluctuationsincashflows Totalcommitments $3,066 $2,505 $524 $21 $16 associated with firm commitments or specific anticipated (a) Approximately $2,262 million and $49 million of standby letters of credit in the transactions contracted in foreign currencies, or hedge the “LessThan1Year”and“1-3Year”periods,respectively,andapproximately$38 exposure to rate changes affecting foreign currency denomi- millionofsuretybondsinthe“LessThan1Year”periodareexpectedtorenewfor nated assets or liabilities. Related gains and losses on these additionalperiodsuntilcompletionofthecontractualobligation. contracts, to the extent they are effective hedges, are recog- nized in income at the same time the hedged transaction is Includedinthetableaboveisapproximately$200million recognized or when the hedged asset or liability is adjusted. representingletterofcreditandsuretybondamountsforwhich To the extent the hedges are ineffective, gains and losses on related obligations or liabilities are also recorded in the bal- the contracts are recognized in the current period. At ance sheet, either as reductions of inventories, as customer December31,2005,thefairvalueofforwardexchangecon- advancesandamountsinexcessofcostsincurred,orasother tractsoutstanding,aswellastheamountsofgainsandlosses liabilities. Approximately $2 billion of the standby letters of recorded during the year then ended, were not material. We credit in the table above were to secure advance payments donotholdorissuederivativefinancialinstrumentsfortrad- received under an F-16 contract from an international cus- ingorspeculativepurposes. tomer. These letters of credit are available for draw down in the event of our nonperformance, and the amount available RECENTACCOUNTINGPRONOUNCEMENTS willbereducedascertaineventsoccurthroughouttheperiod In December 2004, the FASB issued FAS 123(R), Share- ofperformanceinaccordancewiththecontractterms.Similar BasedPayments,whichwillimpactournetearningsandearn- to the letters of credit for the F-16 contract, other letters of ingspershareandchangetheclassificationofcertainelements credit and surety bonds are available for draw down in the of the statement of cash flows. FAS 123(R) requires stock eventofournonperformance. optionsandothershare-basedpaymentsmadetoemployeesto beaccountedforascompensationexpenseandrecordedatfair PAGE 38
-
Page 41
LockheedMartinCorporation value, and to reflect the related excess tax benefit received FIN 47 also clarifies when an entity would have sufficient upon exercise of the options, if any, in the statement of cash information to reasonably estimate the fair value of an asset flowsasafinancingactivityinflowratherthananadjustment retirementobligation.TheadoptionofFIN47didnothavea ofoperatingactivityascurrentlypresented.Wecurrentlyuse significantimpactonourfinancialpositionorresultsofopera- theBlack-Scholesmodeltocomputethefairvalueofourstock tions.Thisisprimarilyduetothefactthatthefairvaluesof options in connection with our disclosure of the pro forma the majority of our asset retirement obligations could not be effectsonnetearningsandearningspershareasifcompensa- reasonably estimated because they had indeterminate settle- tioncosthadbeenrecognizedforsuchoptionsatthedateof mentdates,sincetherangeoftimeoverwhichwemaysettle grant(seeNote1tothefinancialstatements). the obligations is unknown and could not be estimated. WeadoptedFAS123(R),andrelatedSECrulesincluded ConsistentwiththeprovisionsofFIN47,eachobligationwill in SAB No. 107, on a modified prospective basis effective berecordedatthetimethesettlementdateisnolongerinde- January 1, 2006. We will continue to use the Black-Scholes terminateandtheobligationcanbereasonablyestimated. option-pricingmodeltoestimatethefairvalueofstockoptions InMay2004,theFinancialAccountingStandardsBoard granted subsequent to the date of adoption. The Lockheed (FASB) issued FASB Staff Position (FSP) 106-2, Accounting Martin Amended and Restated 2003 Incentive Performance and Disclosure Requirements Related to the Medicare Award Plan provides for the grant of various types of stock- Prescription Drug, Improvement and Modernization Act of based incentive awards, including options to purchase com- 2003.ThisFSPprovidesspecificauthoritativeguidanceonthe monstock,stockappreciationrights,restrictedstockandstock accounting for the federal subsidy to eligible sponsors of units.Thetypesandmixofstock-basedincentiveawardsare retireehealthcarebenefitsprovidedunderthislaw.Usingthis evaluatedonanongoingbasisandmayvarybasedonmanage- guidance,weestimatedaprojectedreductioninouraccumu- ment’s overall strategy regarding compensation, including lated postretirement benefit obligation as of December 31, consideration of the impact of the expensing of stock option 2004 of $295 million from the effects of the new law. This awardsonourresultsofoperationssubsequenttotheadoption obligationwillberecognizedovertheremainingservicelives ofFAS123(R).Basedoncurrentanalysesandinformation,we oftheemployeeseligibleforthebenefit.InJanuary2005,the expect that the combination of expensing stock options upon Center for Medicare and Medicaid Services released regula- adoptionofFAS123(R)in2006andgrantsofrestrictedstock tionsgoverningtheapplicationofthelawandcontinuedtopro- unitswillresultinadditionalexpense,netofstateincometax videclarifyingguidanceduring2005.Basedonthisguidance, benefits, totaling approximately $100 million (or a reduction theimpactofadoptionoftheFSPwasareductionoftheFAS innetearningspershareof$0.15)onafullyearbasis. 106 postretirement expense for the year ended December 31, We also adopted FASB Interpretation No. (FIN) 47, 2005 of approximately $35 million. The postretirement AccountingforConditionalAssetRetirementObligations—an expensecomputedunderFAS106doesnotincludetheeffects interpretationofFASBStatementNo.143,inthefourthquarter ofU.S.GovernmentCostAccountingStandardsorincometax of2005.FIN47clarifiestheterm“conditionalassetretirement benefits. The adoption of the FSP did not have a material obligation”asusedinFAS143,AccountingforAssetRetirement impactonourresultsofoperations,financialpositionorcash Obligations, and requires that a liability and a corresponding flowsfortheyearendedDecember31,2005. increaseinthevalueoftheunderlyingassetberecorded,and depreciation on the increased asset value be expensed, if the fair value of the obligation can be reasonably estimated. The types of asset retirement obligations that are covered by FIN47arethoseforwhichanentityhasalegalobligationto perform an asset retirement activity, even though the timing and/or method of settling the obligation are conditional on a futureeventthatmayormaynotbewithinthecontrolofthe entity.Anexampleofaconditiongivingrisetoanassetretire- mentobligationisthepresenceofembeddedasbestos,radiation sourcesorotherregulatedmaterialsinbuildingsorequipment. PAGE 39
-
Page 42
LockheedMartinCorporation MANAGEMENT’SDISCUSSIONANDANALYSISOF FINANCIALCONDITIONANDRESULTSOFOPERATIONS December31,2005 CONTROLSANDPROCEDURES We performed an evaluation of the effectiveness of our We maintain disclosure controls and procedures, including disclosurecontrolsandprocedures,includinginternalcontrol internal control over financial reporting, that are designed to overfinancialreporting,asofDecember31,2005.Theevalua- ensure that information required to be disclosed in our peri- tion was performed with the participation of senior manage- odicfilingswiththeSECisreportedwithinthetimeperiods ment of each business segment and key Corporate functions, specifiedintheSEC’srulesandforms,andtoprovidereason- andunderthesupervisionoftheCEOandCFO.Basedonour ableassurancethatassetsaresafeguardedandtransactionsare evaluation,weconcludedthatourdisclosurecontrolsandpro- properly executed and recorded. Our disclosure controls and cedureswereeffectiveasofDecember31,2005. procedures are also designed to ensure that information is During2005,wealsoperformedaseparateevaluationof accumulatedandcommunicatedtoourmanagement,including our internal control over financial reporting in accordance ourChiefExecutiveOfficer(CEO)andChiefFinancialOfficer withSection404oftheSarbanes-OxleyAct,includingperform- (CFO), as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding ingself-assessmentandmonitoringprocedures.Basedonthose requireddisclosure.Indesigningandevaluatingsuchcontrols activities and other evaluation procedures, our management, andprocedures,werecognizethatanycontrolsandprocedures, including the CEO and CFO, concluded that internal control no matter how well designed and operated, can provide only over financial reporting was effective as of December 31, reasonable assurance of achieving the desired control objec- 2005. Management’s report on our financial statements and tives,andmanagementnecessarilyisrequiredtouseitsjudg- internal control over financial reporting appears on page 41. ment in evaluating the cost-benefit relationship of possible Inaddition,bothourassessmentandtheeffectivenessofinter- controlsandprocedures.Also,wehaveinvestmentsincertain nalcontroloverfinancialreportingwereauditedbyourinde- unconsolidatedentities.Aswedonotcontrolormanagethese pendentregisteredpublicaccountingfirm.Theirreportappears entities,ourcontrolsandprocedureswithrespecttothoseenti- onpage42. ties are necessarily substantially more limited than those we Therewerenochangesinourinternalcontroloverfinan- maintainwithrespecttoourconsolidatedsubsidiaries. cialreportingduringthemostrecentlycompletedfiscalquar- We routinely review our system of internal control over ter that materially affected, or are reasonably likely to financial reporting and make changes to our processes and materiallyaffect,ourinternalcontroloverfinancialreporting. systems to improve controls and increase efficiency, while ensuring that we maintain an effective internal control envi- ronment.Changesmayincludesuchactivitiesasimplementing new,moreefficientsystems,consolidatingtheactivitiesoftwo ormorebusinessunits,andmigratingcertainprocessestoour Shared Services centers. In addition, when we acquire new businesses, we review the controls and procedures of the acquiredbusinessaspartofourintegrationactivities. PAGE 4 0
-
Page 43
LockheedMartinCorporation MANAGEMENT’SREPORTONTHEFINANCIALSTATEMENTSAND INTERNALCONTROLOVERFINANCIALREPORTING ThemanagementofLockheedMartinisresponsiblefortheconsolidatedfinancialstatementsandallrelatedfinancialinfor- mationcontainedinthisAnnualReportonForm10-K.Theconsolidatedfinancialstatements,whichincludeamountsbasedon estimatesandjudgments,havebeenpreparedinaccordancewithaccountingprinciplesgenerallyacceptedintheUnitedStates. Managementbelievestheconsolidatedfinancialstatementsfairlypresent,inallmaterialrespects,thefinancialcondition,results ofoperationsandcashflowsoftheCorporation.TheconsolidatedfinancialstatementshavebeenauditedbyErnst&YoungLLP, anindependentregisteredpublicaccountingfirm,asstatedintheirreportincludedherein. The management of Lockheed Martin is also responsible for establishing and maintaining an adequate system of internal controloverfinancialreportingoftheCorporation(asdefinedbytheSecuritiesExchangeActof1934).Thissystemisdesigned toprovidereasonableassurance,basedonanappropriatecost-benefitrelationship,thatassetsaresafeguardedandtransactionsare properly executed and recorded. An environment that provides for an appropriate level of control consciousness is maintained throughacomprehensiveprogramofmanagementtestingtoidentifyandcorrectdeficiencies,examinationsbyinternalauditors and audits by the Defense Contract Audit Agency for compliance with federal government rules and regulations applicable to contractswiththeU.S.Government. Management conducted an evaluation of the effectiveness of the Corporation’s system of internal control over financial reportingbasedontheframeworkinInternalControl–IntegratedFrameworkissuedbytheCommitteeofSponsoringOrganizations oftheTreadwayCommission.Basedonthisevaluation,managementconcludedthattheCorporation’ssystemofinternalcontrol overfinancialreportingwaseffectiveasofDecember31,2005.Management’sassessmenthasbeenauditedbyErnst&Young LLP,asstatedintheirreportincludedherein. EssentialtotheCorporation’sinternalcontrolsystemismanagement’sdedicationtothehigheststandardsofintegrity,ethics and social responsibility. To support these standards, management has issued the Code of Ethics and Business Conduct (the Code).TheCodeprovidesforahelplinethatemployeescanusetoconfidentiallyoranonymouslycommunicatetotheCorporation’s ethicsofficecomplaintsorconcernsaboutaccounting,internalcontrolorauditingmatters.Thesemattersareforwardeddirectly totheAuditCommitteeoftheCorporation’sBoardofDirectors. TheAuditCommittee,whichiscomposedoffivedirectorswhoarenotmembersofmanagement,hasoversightresponsibility fortheCorporation’sfinancialreportingprocessandtheauditsoftheconsolidatedfinancialstatementsandinternalcontrolover financial reporting. Both the independent auditors and the internal auditors meet periodically with members of the Audit Committee,withorwithoutmanagementrepresentativespresent.TheAuditCommitteerecommended,andtheBoardofDirectors approved,thattheauditedconsolidatedfinancialstatementsbeincludedintheCorporation’sAnnualReportonForm10-Kfor filingwiththeSecuritiesandExchangeCommission. ROBERTJ.STEVENS CHRISTOPHERE.KUBASIK Chairman,PresidentandChief ExecutiveVicePresidentandChief ExecutiveOfficer FinancialOfficer PAGE 41
-
Page 44
LockheedMartinCorporation REPORTOFERNST&YOUNGLLP,INDEPENDENTREGISTEREDPUBLIC ACCOUNTINGFIRM,REGARDINGINTERNALCONTROLOVERFINANCIALREPORTING BoardofDirectorsandStockholders LockheedMartinCorporation Wehaveauditedmanagement’sassessment,includedintheaccompanyingManagement’sReportontheFinancialStatements and Internal Control Over Financial Reporting, that Lockheed Martin Corporation maintained effective internal control over financialreportingasofDecember31,2005,basedoncriteriaestablishedinInternalControl–IntegratedFrameworkissuedbythe CommitteeofSponsoringOrganizationsoftheTreadwayCommission(theCOSOcriteria).LockheedMartinCorporation’sman- agementisresponsibleformaintainingeffectiveinternalcontroloverfinancialreportingandforitsassessmentoftheeffective- nessofinternalcontroloverfinancialreporting.Ourresponsibilityistoexpressanopiniononmanagement’sassessmentandan opinionontheeffectivenessoftheCorporation’sinternalcontroloverfinancialreportingbasedonouraudit. We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States).Thosestandardsrequirethatweplanandperformtheaudittoobtainreasonableassuranceaboutwhethereffectiveinter- nalcontroloverfinancialreportingwas maintainedinallmaterialrespects.Ourauditincludedobtaininganunderstandingof internal control over financial reporting, evaluating management’s assessment, testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control, and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. Webelievethatourauditprovidesareasonablebasisforouropinion. A company’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliabilityoffinancialreportingandthepreparationoffinancialstatementsforexternalpurposesinaccordancewithgenerally acceptedaccountingprinciples.Acompany’sinternalcontroloverfinancialreportingincludesthosepoliciesandproceduresthat (1)pertaintothemaintenanceofrecordsthat,inreasonabledetail,accuratelyandfairlyreflectthetransactionsanddispositions oftheassetsofthecompany;(2)providereasonableassurancethattransactionsarerecordedasnecessarytopermitpreparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the companyarebeingmadeonlyinaccordancewithauthorizationsofmanagementanddirectorsofthecompany;and(3)provide reasonableassuranceregardingpreventionortimelydetectionofunauthorizedacquisition,use,ordispositionofthecompany’s assetsthatcouldhaveamaterialeffectonthefinancialstatements. Becauseofitsinherentlimitations,internalcontroloverfinancialreportingmaynotpreventordetectmisstatements.Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate becauseofchangesinconditions,orthatthedegreeofcompliancewiththepoliciesorproceduresmaydeteriorate. Inouropinion,management’sassessmentthatLockheedMartinCorporationmaintainedeffectiveinternalcontroloverfinan- cialreportingasofDecember31,2005,isfairlystated,inallmaterialrespects,basedontheCOSOcriteria.Also,inouropinion, Lockheed Martin Corporation maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of December31,2005,basedontheCOSOcriteria. Wealsohaveaudited,inaccordancewiththestandardsofthePublicCompanyAccountingOversightBoard(UnitedStates), theconsolidatedbalancesheetsofLockheedMartinCorporationandsubsidiariesasofDecember31,2005and2004,andthe relatedconsolidatedstatementsofearnings,stockholders’equity,andcashflowsforeachofthethreeyearsintheperiodended December 31, 2005 of Lockheed Martin Corporation and our report dated February 22, 2006 expressed an unqualified opinionthereon. /s/Ernst&YoungLLP ERNST&YOUNGLLP Baltimore,Maryland February22,2006 PAGE 42
-
Page 45
LockheedMartinCorporation REPORTOFERNST&YOUNGLLP,INDEPENDENTREGISTEREDPUBLIC ACCOUNTINGFIRM,ONTHEAUDITEDCONSOLIDATEDFINANCIALSTATEMENTS BoardofDirectorsandStockholders LockheedMartinCorporation We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Lockheed Martin Corporation and subsidiaries as of December31,2005and2004,andtherelatedconsolidatedstatementsofearnings,stockholders’equity,andcashflowsforeach ofthethreeyearsintheperiodendedDecember31,2005.ThesefinancialstatementsaretheresponsibilityoftheCorporation’s management.Ourresponsibilityistoexpressanopiniononthesefinancialstatementsbasedonouraudits. We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States).Thosestandardsrequirethatweplanandperformtheaudittoobtainreasonableassuranceaboutwhetherthefinancial statementsarefreeofmaterialmisstatement.Anauditincludesexamining,onatestbasis,evidencesupportingtheamountsand disclosuresinthefinancialstatements.Anauditalsoincludesassessingtheaccountingprinciplesusedandsignificantestimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonablebasisforouropinion. Inouropinion,thefinancialstatementsreferredtoabovepresentfairly,inallmaterialrespects,theconsolidatedfinancial positionofLockheedMartinCorporationandsubsidiariesatDecember31,2005and2004,andtheconsolidatedresultsoftheir operations and their cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2005 in conformity with U.S. generallyacceptedaccountingprinciples. Wealsohaveaudited,inaccordancewiththestandardsofthePublicCompanyAccountingOversightBoard(UnitedStates), theeffectivenessofLockheedMartinCorporation’sinternalcontroloverfinancialreportingasofDecember31,2005basedon criteria established in Internal Control–Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the TreadwayCommissionandourreportdatedFebruary22,2006expressedanunqualifiedopinionthereon. Baltimore,Maryland February22,2006 PAGE 43
-
Page 46
LockheedMartinCorporation CONSOLIDATEDSTATEMENTOFEARNINGS YearEndedDecember31, (Inmillions,exceptpersharedata) 2005 2004 2003 NETSALES Products $31,518 $30,202 $27,290 Services 5,695 5,324 4,534 37,213 35,526 31,824 COSTOFSALES Products 28,800 27,879 25,306 Services 5,073 4,765 4,099 UnallocatedCorporatecosts 803 914 443 34,676 33,558 29,848 2,537 1,968 1,976 Otherincomeandexpenses,net 449 121 43 Operatingprofit 2,986 2,089 2,019 Interestexpense 370 425 487 Earningsbeforetaxes 2,616 1,664 1,532 Incometaxexpense 791 398 479 NETEARNINGS $ 1,825 $ 1,266 $ 1,053 EARNINGSPERCOMMONSHARE: Basic $ 4.15 $ 2.86 $ 2.36 Diluted $ 4.10 $ 2.83 $ 2.34 SeeaccompanyingNotestoConsolidatedFinancialStatements. PAGE 4 4
-
Page 47
LockheedMartinCorporation CONSOLIDATEDBALANCESHEET December31, (Inmillions) 2005 2004 ASSETS Currentassets Cashandcashequivalents $2,244 $1,060 Short-terminvestments 429 396 Receivables 4,579 4,094 Inventories 1,921 1,864 Deferredincometaxes 861 982 Othercurrentassets 495 557 Totalcurrentassets 10,529 8,953 Property,plantandequipment,net 3,924 3,599 Investmentsinequitysecurities 196 812 Goodwill 8,447 7,892 Purchasedintangibles,net 560 672 Prepaidpensionasset 1,360 1,030 Otherassets 2,728 2,596 $27,744 $25,554 LIABILITIESANDSTOCKHOLDERS’EQUITY Currentliabilities Accountspayable $1,998 $1,726 Customeradvancesandamountsinexcessofcostsincurred 4,331 4,028 Salaries,benefitsandpayrolltaxes 1,475 1,346 Currentmaturitiesoflong-termdebt 202 15 Othercurrentliabilities 1,422 1,451 Totalcurrentliabilities 9,428 8,566 Long-termdebt 4,784 5,104 Accruedpensionliabilities 2,097 1,660 Otherpostretirementbenefitliabilities 1,277 1,236 Otherliabilities 2,291 1,967 Stockholders’equity Commonstock,$1parvaluepershare 432 438 Additionalpaid-incapital 1,724 2,223 Retainedearnings 7,278 5,915 Accumulatedothercomprehensiveloss (1,553) (1,532) Other (14) (23) Totalstockholders’equity 7,867 7,021 $27,744 $25,554 SeeaccompanyingNotestoConsolidatedFinancialStatements. PAGE 45
-
Page 48
LockheedMartinCorporation CONSOLIDATEDSTATEMENTOFCASHFLOWS YearEndedDecember31, (Inmillions) 2005 2004 2003 OPERATINGACTIVITIES Netearnings $1,825 $1,266 $1,053 Adjustmentstoreconcilenetearningstonetcashprovidedbyoperatingactivities: Depreciationandamortization 555 511 480 Amortizationofpurchasedintangibles 150 145 129 Deferredfederalincometaxes 24 (58) 467 Changesinoperatingassetsandliabilities: Receivables (390) (87) (258) Inventories (39) 519 (94) Accountspayable 239 288 330 Customeradvancesandamountsinexcessofcostsincurred 296 (228) (285) Other 534 568 (13) Netcashprovidedbyoperatingactivities 3,194 2,924 1,809 INVESTINGACTIVITIES Expendituresforproperty,plantandequipment (865) (769) (687) Acquisitionofbusinesses/investmentsinaffiliatedcompanies (564) (91) (821) Proceedsfromdivestitureofbusinesses/investmentsinaffiliatedcompanies 935 279 234 Purchaseofshort-terminvestments,net (33) (156) (240) Other 28 29 53 Netcashusedforinvestingactivities (499) (708) (1,461) FINANCINGACTIVITIES Repaymentsoflong-termdebt (133) (1,089) (2,202) Issuancesoflong-termdebt — — 1,000 Long-termdebtrepaymentandissuancecosts (12) (163) (175) Issuancesofcommonstock 406 164 44 Repurchasesofcommonstock (1,310) (673) (482) Commonstockdividends (462) (405) (261) Netcashusedforfinancingactivities (1,511) (2,166) (2,076) Netincrease(decrease)incashandcashequivalents 1,184 50 (1,728) Cashandcashequivalentsatbeginningofyear 1,060 1,010 2,738 Cashandcashequivalentsatendofyear $2,244 $1,060 $1,010 SeeaccompanyingNotestoConsolidatedFinancialStatements. PAGE 4 6
-
Page 49
LockheedMartinCorporation CONSOLIDATEDSTATEMENTOFSTOCKHOLDERS’EQUITY Accumulated Compre- Additional Other Total hensive Common Paid-In Retained Comprehensive Stockholders’ Income (Inmillions,exceptpersharedata) Stock Capital Earnings (Loss)Income Other Equity (Loss) BalanceatDecember31,2002 $455 $2,796 $4,262 $(1,598) $(50) $5,865 Netearnings — — 1,053 — — 1,053 $1,053 Commonstockdividendsdeclared ($0.58pershare) — — (261) — — (261) — Repurchasesofcommonstock (11) (471) — — — (482) — Stock-basedawardsandESOPactivity 2 152 — — 33 187 — Othercomprehensiveincome(loss): Minimumpensionliability — — — 331 — 331 331 Netunrealizedgainfrom available-for-saleinvestments — — — 46 — 46 46 Other — — — 17 — 17 17 BalanceatDecember31,2003 446 2,477 5,054 (1,204) (17) 6,756 $1,447 Netearnings — — 1,266 — — 1,266 $1,266 Commonstockdividendsdeclared ($0.91pershare) — — (405) — — (405) — Repurchasesofcommonstock (15) (757) — — — (772) — Stock-basedawardsandESOPactivity 7 503 — — (6) 504 — Othercomprehensiveincome(loss): Minimumpensionliability — — — (285) — (285) (285) Reclassificationadjustmentsrelatedto available-for-saleinvestments — — — (56) — (56) (56) Other — — — 13 — 13 13 BalanceatDecember31,2004 438 2,223 5,915 (1,532) (23) 7,021 $ 938 Netearnings — — 1,825 — — 1,825 $1,825 Commonstockdividendsdeclared ($1.05pershare) — — (462) — — (462) — Repurchasesofcommonstock (20) (1,202) — — — (1,222) — Stock-basedawardsandESOPactivity 14 703 — — 9 726 — Othercomprehensiveincome(loss): Minimumpensionliability — — — (105) — (105) (105) Netunrealizedgainfrom available-for-saleinvestments — — — 97 — 97 97 Other — — — (13) — (13) (13) BalanceatDecember31,2005 $432 $1,724 $7,278 $(1,553) $(14) $7,867 $1,804 SeeaccompanyingNotestoConsolidatedFinancialStatements. PAGE 47
-
Page 50
LockheedMartinCorporation NOTESTOCONSOLIDATEDFINANCIALSTATEMENTS December31,2005 NOTE1—SIGNIFICANTACCOUNTINGPOLICIES Short-term investments—The Corporation’s short-term Organization—Lockheed Martin Corporation (Lockheed investments consist of marketable securities that are catego- MartinortheCorporation)isengagedintheresearch,design, rized as available-for-sale securities as defined by Statement development,manufacture,integration,operationandsustain- ofFinancialAccountingStandards(FAS)115,Accountingfor mentofadvancedtechnologysystems,productsandservices. Certain Investments in Debt and Equity Securities. Realized Asaleadingsystemsintegrator,itsproductsandservicesrange gains and losses are recorded in other income and expenses. fromelectronicsandinformationsystems,includingintegrated For purposes of computing realized gains and losses, cost is net-centric solutions, to missiles, aircraft, spacecraft and determined on a specific identification basis. The fair values launch services. The Corporation serves customers in both ofmarketablesecuritiesareestimatedbasedonquotedmarket domesticandinternationaldefenseandcommercialbusinesses, pricesfortherespectivesecurities. with its principal customers being agencies of the U.S. The Corporation records short-term investments at fair Government. value.Atyearend,theinvestmentportfoliowascomposedof thefollowing: Basis of consolidation and classifications—The consolidated YearEndedDecember31, financial statements include the accounts of wholly-owned 2005 2004 subsidiariesandotherentitieswhichtheCorporationcontrols. Intercompanybalancesandtransactionshavebeeneliminated Amortized Fair Amortized Fair in consolidation. Receivables and inventories are primarily (Inmillions) Cost Value Cost Value attributabletolong-termcontractsorprogramsinprogressfor U.S.treasuryand which the related operating cycles are longer than one year. governmentagency Inaccordancewithindustrypractice,theseitemsareincluded securities $125 $124 $252 $251 incurrentassets. Corporatedebtsecurities 145 144 117 117 Certainamountsforprioryearshavebeenreclassifiedto Mortgage-backedand conformwiththe2005presentation. othersecurities 161 161 28 28 $431 $429 $397 $396 Use of estimates—The preparation of consolidated financial statementsinconformitywithaccountingprinciplesgenerally Approximately 60% of the securities had contractual acceptedintheUnitedStates(GAAP)requiresmanagementto maturitiesofoneyearorless.Anadditional36%ofthesecuri- makeestimatesandassumptions,includingestimatesofantic- tieshadcontractualmaturitiesofonetofiveyears.Marketable ipatedcontractcostsandrevenuesutilizedintheearningsrec- securities sales proceeds totaled $461 million in 2005 and ognition process, that affect the reported amounts in the $384millionin2004.Grossgainsandlossesrelatedtosales financial statements and accompanying notes. Due to the size ofmarketablesecuritiesforbothyears,aswellasnetunreal- andnatureofmanyoftheCorporation’sprograms,theestima- izedgainsandlossesateachyearend,werenotmaterial. tionoftotalrevenuesandcostatcompletionissubjecttoawide rangeofvariables,includingassumptionsforscheduleandtech- Receivables—Receivables consist of amounts billed and cur- nicalissues.Actualresultsmaydifferfromthoseestimates. rently due from customers, and unbilled costs and accrued profits primarily related to revenues on long-term contracts Cash and cash equivalents—Cash equivalents are generally thathavebeenrecognizedforaccountingpurposesbutnotyet composed of highly liquid instruments with original maturi- billedtocustomers.Assuchrevenuesarerecognized,appro- ties of 90 days or less. Due to the short maturity of these priateamountsofcustomeradvances,performance-basedpay- instruments,carryingvalueontheCorporation’sconsolidated mentsandprogresspaymentsarereflectedasanoffsettothe balancesheetapproximatesfairvalue. relatedreceivablesbalance. PAGE 4 8
View More
Get the full picture and Receive alerts on lawsuits, news articles, publications and more!