array(3) { ["company_details"]=> array(13) { ["name"]=> string(24) "Equus Total Return, Inc." ["slug"]=> string(31) "a1f25-us-equus-total-return-inc" ["logo"]=> NULL ["description"]=> NULL ["address_street"]=> string(22) "700 Louisiana St FL 48" ["address_place"]=> string(7) "Houston" ["address_region"]=> string(5) "Texas" ["founding_date"]=> string(10) "1983-01-27" ["website_domain"]=> NULL ["website_url"]=> NULL ["industry_codes"]=> array(1) { [0]=> string(35) "Investors, Not Elsewhere Classified" } ["employee_count"]=> int(4) ["article_count"]=> int(123) } ["articles"]=> array(1) { [0]=> array(7) { ["title_en"]=> string(162) "No Rummaging Required: Chancery Court Rules Form 10-K Adequate to Discharge Duty of Disclosure When Provided Conspicuously and Concurrently with Stockholder Proxy" ["snippet_en"]=> string(150) "DE Chancery Court held that 10-K, when mailed with Proxy, was adequate to discharge Board’s disclosure obligations to stockholders as matter of law." ["url"]=> string(116) "https://www.natlawreview.com/article/no-rummaging-required-chancery-court-rules-form-10-k-adequate-to-discharge-duty" ["image_url"]=> string(78) "https://images.businessradar.com/articles/9c3f87b3-748c-441d-ac52-fcf8955c6699" ["source"]=> string(16) "natlawreview.com" ["publication_date"]=> string(10) "2021-10-04" ["categories"]=> array(3) { [0]=> string(5) "Legal" [1]=> string(12) "Board Change" [2]=> string(46) "Management of Legal and Regulatory Environment" } } } ["category_annotations"]=> array(30) { [0]=> array(2) { ["name"]=> string(12) "Stock Market" ["count"]=> int(11) } [1]=> array(2) { ["name"]=> string(24) "Quarterly/Annual Figures" ["count"]=> int(9) } [2]=> array(2) { ["name"]=> string(7) "Funding" ["count"]=> int(8) } [3]=> array(2) { ["name"]=> string(11) "Acquisition" ["count"]=> int(7) } [4]=> array(2) { ["name"]=> string(18) "General Investment" ["count"]=> int(7) } [5]=> array(2) { ["name"]=> string(23) "Real estate development" ["count"]=> int(4) } [6]=> array(2) { ["name"]=> string(20) "Business Development" ["count"]=> int(4) } [7]=> array(2) { ["name"]=> string(13) "Collaboration" ["count"]=> int(4) } [8]=> array(2) { ["name"]=> string(11) "Slush Funds" ["count"]=> int(4) } [9]=> array(2) { ["name"]=> string(18) "Expansion & Growth" ["count"]=> int(4) } [10]=> array(2) { ["name"]=> string(5) "Award" ["count"]=> int(4) } [11]=> array(2) { ["name"]=> string(12) "Board Change" ["count"]=> int(3) } [12]=> array(2) { ["name"]=> string(25) "Business Model Resilience" ["count"]=> int(3) } [13]=> array(2) { ["name"]=> string(15) "Deals & Tenders" ["count"]=> int(3) } [14]=> array(2) { ["name"]=> string(10) "Divestment" ["count"]=> int(3) } [15]=> array(2) { ["name"]=> string(14) "Product Launch" ["count"]=> int(3) } [16]=> array(2) { ["name"]=> string(17) "Energy Management" ["count"]=> int(3) } [17]=> array(2) { ["name"]=> string(10) "Relocation" ["count"]=> int(3) } [18]=> array(2) { ["name"]=> string(21) "Competitive Behaviour" ["count"]=> int(2) } [19]=> array(2) { ["name"]=> string(10) "Executives" ["count"]=> int(2) } [20]=> array(2) { ["name"]=> string(11) "Competition" ["count"]=> int(2) } [21]=> array(2) { ["name"]=> string(21) "Explosion & Gas Leaks" ["count"]=> int(2) } [22]=> array(2) { ["name"]=> string(31) "Financial Update/Profit Warning" ["count"]=> int(2) } [23]=> array(2) { ["name"]=> string(21) "Shareholders Feedback" ["count"]=> int(2) } [24]=> array(2) { ["name"]=> string(15) "Market Movement" ["count"]=> int(2) } [25]=> array(2) { ["name"]=> string(19) "Green & Responsible" ["count"]=> int(2) } [26]=> array(2) { ["name"]=> string(14) "Issuing Shares" ["count"]=> int(2) } [27]=> array(2) { ["name"]=> string(30) "Suppliers/customers reputation" ["count"]=> int(1) } [28]=> array(2) { ["name"]=> string(17) "Commodity Pricing" ["count"]=> int(1) } [29]=> array(2) { ["name"]=> string(20) "Corporate Governance" ["count"]=> int(1) } } } a1f25-us-equus-total-return-inc

Equus Total Return, Inc.

Location

Texas

Founded

1983-01-27

Website

Articles

123 Articles

Category

Investors, Not Elsewhere Classified

Description

Articles

No Rummaging Required: Chancery Court Rules Form 10-K Adequate to Discharge Duty of Disclosure When Provided Conspicuously and Concurrently with Stockholder Proxy

2021-10-04 (natlawreview.com)

No Rummaging Required: Chancery Court Rules Form 10-K Adequate to Discharge Duty of Disclosure When Provided Conspicuously and Concurrently with Stockholder Proxy

DE Chancery Court held that 10-K, when mailed with Proxy, was adequate to discharge Board’s disclosure obligations to stockholders as matter of law.

Read more

Newsletter subscription